Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600738›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2018

Functional brain networks reconstruction using group sparsity-regularized learning.

Qinghua Zhao, Will X Y Li, Xi Jiang, Jinglei Lv, Jianfeng Lu, Tianming Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qinghua ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Will X Y LiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Xi JiangCortical Architecture Imaging and Discovery Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Bioimaging Research Center, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Jinglei LvCortical Architecture Imaging and Discovery Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Bioimaging Research Center, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Jianfeng LuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Tianming LiuCortical Architecture Imaging and Discovery Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Bioimaging Research Center, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. tliu@cs.uga.edu.

Funding

Assessing Large-scale Connectivities in Prenatal Cocaine Exposure Affected BrainsR01DA033393 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI HU, XIAOPING P, LIU, TIANMING · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Assessing Large-scale Brain Connectivities in Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR01AG042599 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI LIU, TIANMING · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
National Institutes of Health AG042599National Institutes of Health DA033393NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042599NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating functional brain networks and patterns using sparse representation of fMRI data has received significant interests in the neuroimaging community. It has been reported that sparse representation is effective in reconstructing concurrent and interactive functional brain networks. To date, most of data-driven network reconstruction approaches rarely take consideration of anatomical structures, which are the substrate of brain function. Furthermore, it has been rarely explored whether structured sparse representation with anatomical guidance could facilitate functional networks reconstruction. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose to reconstruct brain networks utilizing the structure guided group sparse regression (S2GSR) in which 116 anatomical regions from the AAL template, as prior knowledge, are employed to guide the network reconstruction when performing sparse representation of whole-brain fMRI data. Specifically, we extract fMRI signals from standard space aligned with the AAL template. Then by learning a global over-complete dictionary, with the learned dictionary as a set of features (regressors), the group structured regression employs anatomical structures as group information to regress whole brain signals. Finally, the decomposition coefficients matrix is mapped back to the brain volume to represent functional brain networks and patterns. We use the publicly available Human Connectome Project (HCP) Q1 dataset as the test bed, and the experimental results indicate that the proposed anatomically guided structure sparse representation is effective in reconstructing concurrent functional brain networks.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental ProcessesReproducibility of ResultsAAL templateDictionary learningFunctional networksGroup sparsitySparse representation

Identifiers

PMID28600738
PMCPMC5723255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.