Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600600›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2017

The nervous and visual systems of onychophorans and tardigrades: learning about arthropod evolution from their closest relatives.

Christine Martin, Vladimir Gross, Lars Hering, Benjamin Tepper, Henry Jahn, Ivo de Sena Oliveira, Paul Anthony Stevenson, Georg Mayer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Uncovering developmental diversity in the field.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review of extra-embryonic tissues in the closest arthropod relatives, onychophorans and tardigrades.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine MartinDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany.
Vladimir GrossDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany.
Lars HeringDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany.
Benjamin TepperDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany.
Henry JahnDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany.
Ivo de Sena OliveiraDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany.
Paul Anthony StevensonPhysiology of Animals and Behaviour, Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Talstraße 33, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Georg MayerDepartment of Zoology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132, Kassel, Germany. georg.mayer@uni-kassel.de.
University of Kassel · DELeipzig University · DEUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the origin and evolution of arthropods requires examining their closest outgroups, the tardigrades (water bears) and onychophorans (velvet worms). Despite the rise of molecular techniques, the phylogenetic positions of tardigrades and onychophorans in the panarthropod tree (onychophorans + tardigrades + arthropods) remain unresolved. Hence, these methods alone are currently insufficient for clarifying the panarthropod topology. Therefore, the evolution of different morphological traits, such as one of the most intriguing features of panarthropods-their nervous system-becomes essential for shedding light on the origin and evolution of arthropods and their relatives within the Panarthropoda. In this review, we summarise current knowledge of the evolution of panarthropod nervous and visual systems. In particular, we focus on the evolution of segmental ganglia, the segmental identity of brain regions, and the visual system from morphological and developmental perspectives. In so doing, we address some of the many controversies surrounding these topics, such as the homology of the onychophoran eyes to those of arthropods as well as the segmentation of the tardigrade brain. Finally, we attempt to reconstruct the most likely state of these systems in the last common ancestors of arthropods and panarthropods based on what is currently known about tardigrades and onychophorans.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsArthropodsNervous SystemPhylogenyVisual PathwaysBrainEyeNervous systemVelvet wormsWater bears

Identifiers

PMID28600600
OpenAlexW2623545199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.