Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600593›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2017

[Paradoxical sphincters and cardinal continence function of the gastric fundus].

F Stelzner, N Friedrichs

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F StelznerChir. Univ. Klinik, Zentrum für Chirurgie, Universität, Bonn Venusberg, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. stel33345@aol.com.
N FriedrichsZentrum für Pathologie, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
University of Bonn · DEZentrum für Pathologie und Zytodiagnostik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder in humans and has been treated for the last 67 years using fundoplication. However, treatment results have generally not been satisfactory. Physiological and anatomic findings must be taken into account to improve the therapy technique. In this article, these are described using the example of paradoxical sphincters and the effect of NO signal molecules in the gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsFundoplicationGastric FundusGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMiceNitric OxidePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceSpecies SpecificityTreatment OutcomeAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingNitric OxideNOS1AP protein, humanFundoplicationFundus ventriculiGastroesophageal reflux diseaseNO (nitric oxide) signal moleculeRecurrent reflux

Identifiers

PMID28600593
OpenAlexW2622448823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.