Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600382›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2017

N Neves, D Linhares, G Costa, C C Ribeiro, M A Barbosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nanostructured Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N NevesInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto and Researcher, INEB - Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto and Lecturer Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Surgery Department, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto and Orthopaedic Surgeon Centro Hospitalar de São João, Orthopedic Department, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal nsmneves@gmail.com.
D LinharesOrthopaedic Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto and Researcher and Lecturer, MEDCIDS - Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto Portugal.
G CostaFaculty of Medicine, Surgery Department, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, and Orthopaedic Surgeon, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
C C RibeiroInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal and Researcher, INEB - Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto and Professor, ISEP - Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.
M A BarbosaInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto and Researcher, INEB - Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto and Professor, ICBAS-Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Hospital de São João · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTPolytechnic Institute of Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis systematic review aimed to assess the

methodsA systematic search was performed in Pubmed, followed by a two-step selection process. We included

resultsA total of 572 references were retrieved and 27 were included. Animal models were used in 26 articles, and one article described a human study. Osteoporotic models were included in 11 papers. All articles showed similar or increased effect of Sr in bone formation and/or regeneration, in both healthy and osteoporotic models. No study found a decreased effect. Adverse effects were assessed in 17 articles, 13 on local and four on systemic adverse effects. From these, only one reported a systemic impact from Sr addition. Data on gene and/or protein expression were available from seven studies.

conclusionsThis review showed the safety and effectiveness of Sr-enriched biomaterials for stimulating bone formation and remodelling in animal models. The effect seems to increase over time and is impacted by the concentration used. However, included studies present a wide range of study methods. Future work should focus on consistent models and guidelines when developing a future clinical application of this element.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsBoneStrontium

Identifiers

PMID28600382
PMCPMC5492369
OpenAlexW2624608863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.