Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600332›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2018

Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of

Philip M Giffard, Rachael A Lilliebridge, Judith Wilson, Gerald Murray, Samuel Phillips, Sepehr N Tabrizi, Suzanne M Garland, Louise Martin, Gurmeet Singh, Steven Y C Tong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Philip M GiffardGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Rachael A LilliebridgeGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Judith WilsonGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Gerald MurrayMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Samuel PhillipsMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sepehr N TabriziMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Suzanne M GarlandMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Louise MartinRoyal Darwin Hospital, Top End Health Service, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Gurmeet SinghRoyal Darwin Hospital, Top End Health Service, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Steven Y C TongGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Deborah C HoltGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Patiyan AnderssonGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe detection of an STI agent in a urogenital tract (UGT) specimen from a young child is regarded as being indicative of sexual abuse. However, the probabilities of contamination events that could conceivably lead to STI positive specimens in the absence of sexual contact are unclear. The objective was to estimate the potential for fingers that have come in contact with

methodsThe study design was based on self-experimentation. Dilutions of

resultsThe amplimer crossing point (Cq) for EB dilutions was 10.0±1.6 less than for corresponding finger contacted urine specimens, which corresponds to ~10 µL of EB suspension transferred. This was largely independent of participant identity,

conclusionsThis study directly demonstrated the potential for urine contaminated fingers to convert a

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesChildChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisDNA, BacterialDNA ContaminationFemaleFingersHand DisinfectionHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityUrine Specimen CollectionDNA, Bacterialchildrenchlamydia trachomatissexual abuseurine

Identifiers

PMID28600332
PMCPMC5800334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.