Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600296›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2017

Making the Case for Investment in Rural Cancer Control: An Analysis of Rural Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Funding Trends.

Kelly D Blake, Jennifer L Moss, Anna Gaysynsky, Shobha Srinivasan, Robert T Croyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 252 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
252citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

252 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Educational Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Rural Populations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. The role of digital health technology in rural cancer care delivery: A systematic review.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Recruiting Rural Patients for Clinical Research: Lessons From a Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Trial
  8. Feasibility of a Remote Patient Video Education Intervention to Improve Care Coordination for Rural Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cancer Among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, 1999-2020.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

192 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelly D BlakeDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. kelly.blake@nih.gov.
Jennifer L MossDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Anna GaysynskyDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Shobha SrinivasanDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert T CroyleDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimates of those living in rural counties vary from 46.2 to 59 million, or 14% to 19% of the U.S. POPULATION: Rural communities face disadvantages compared with urban areas, including higher poverty, lower educational attainment, and lack of access to health services. We aimed to demonstrate rural-urban disparities in cancer and to examine NCI-funded cancer control grants focused on rural populations. Estimates of 5-year cancer incidence and mortality from 2009 to 2013 were generated for counties at each level of the rural-urban continuum and for metropolitan versus nonmetropolitan counties, for all cancers combined and several individual cancer types. We also examined the number and foci of rural cancer control grants funded by NCI from 2011 to 2016. Cancer incidence was 447 cases per 100,000 in metropolitan counties and 460 per 100,000 in nonmetropolitan counties (

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentHealthcare DisparitiesHumansIncidenceNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsRural HealthRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSEER ProgramUnited StatesUrban HealthUrban Health ServicesUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID28600296
PMCPMC5500425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.