ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
A Self-Training Subspace Clustering Algorithm under Low-Rank Representation for Cancer Classification on Gene Expression Data.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generalized Matrix Local Low Rank Representation by Random Projection and Submatrix Propagation.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2023Article
- Identification of PTPN20 as an innate immunity-related gene in gastric cancer with Helicobacter pylori infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- A self-training subspace clustering algorithm based on adaptive confidence for gene expression data.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Comprehensive analysis ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Online Education Classroom Intelligent Management System Based on Tensor CS Reconstruction Model.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- A Cascade Flexible Neural Forest Model for Cancer Subtypes Classification on Gene Expression Data.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021Article
- Developing Sustainable Classification of Diseases via Deep Learning and Semi-Supervised Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of the cancer types is essential to cancer diagnoses and treatments. Since cancer tissue and normal tissue have different gene expression, gene expression data can be used as an efficient feature source for cancer classification. However, accurate cancer classification directly using original gene expression profiles remains challenging due to the intrinsic high-dimension feature and the small size of the data samples. We proposed a new self-training subspace clustering algorithm under low-rank representation, called SSC-LRR, for cancer classification on gene expression data. Low-rank representation (LRR) is first applied to extract discriminative features from the high-dimensional gene expression data; the self-training subspace clustering (SSC) method is then used to generate the cancer classification predictions. The SSC-LRR was tested on two separate benchmark datasets in control with four state-of-the-art classification methods. It generated cancer classification predictions with an overall accuracy 89.7 percent and a general correlation 0.920, which are 18.9 and 24.4 percent higher than that of the best control method respectively. In addition, several genes (RNF114, HLA-DRB5, USP9Y, and PTPN20) were identified by SSC-LRR as new cancer identifiers that deserve further clinical investigation. Overall, the study demonstrated a new sensitive avenue to recognize cancer classifications from large-scale gene expression data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.