Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600210›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2017

Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the randomised UK TACT2 trial (CRUK/05/19): a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.

David Cameron, James P Morden, Peter Canney, Galina Velikova, Robert Coleman, John Bartlett, Rajiv Agrawal, Jane Banerji, Gianfilippo Bertelli, David Bloomfield and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Tailored Dose-Dense Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: End-of-Study Results of the Randomized PANTHER Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Adjuvant Capecitabine for Early Breast Cancer: 15-Year Overall Survival Results From a Randomized Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

David CameronCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: D.Cameron@ed.ac.uk.
James P MordenICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Peter CanneyDepartment of Oncology, Beatson Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Galina VelikovaSt James' Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Robert ColemanDepartment of Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
John BartlettDepartment of Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rajiv AgrawalDepartment of Oncology, Shrewsbury & Telford Hospitals NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Jane BanerjiICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Gianfilippo BertelliDepartment of Oncology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK.
David BloomfieldDepartment of Oncology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK.
A Murray BruntDepartment of Oncology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Helena EarlDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Paul EllisDepartment of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Claire GauntCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, UK.
Alexa GillmanICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Nicholas HearfieldClinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Robert LaingDepartment of Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Nicholas MurrayDepartment of Oncology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Niki CouperCancer Clinical Trials Unit Scotland (CaCTUS), Glasgow, UK.
Robert C SteinDepartment of Oncology, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Mark VerrillDepartment of Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK.
Andrew WardleyDepartment of Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Peter Barrett-LeeDepartment of Oncology, Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.
Judith M BlissICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
TACT2 Investigators
Institute of Cancer Research · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBFreeman Hospital · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CARoyal Stoke University Hospital · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GBShrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust · GBSingleton Hospital · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBThe Christie Hospital · GBUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBVelindre NHS Trust · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15955Cancer Research UK 15958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer has improved outcomes but causes toxicity. The UK TACT2 trial used a 2×2 factorial design to test two hypotheses: whether use of accelerated epirubicin would improve time to tumour recurrence (TTR); and whether use of oral capecitabine instead of cyclophosphamide would be non-inferior in terms of patients' outcomes and would improve toxicity, quality of life, or both.

methodsIn this multicentre, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older from 129 UK centres who had histologically confirmed node-positive or high-risk node-negative operable breast cancer, had undergone complete excision, and were due to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of 100 mg/m

findingsFrom Dec 16, 2005, to Dec 5, 2008, 4391 patients (4371 women and 20 men) were recruited. At a median follow-up of 85·6 months (IQR 80·6-95·9) no significant difference was seen in the proportions of patients free from TTR events between the accelerated and standard epirubicin groups (overall hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·81-1·09; stratified p=0·42). At 5 years, 85·9% (95% CI 84·3-87·3) of patients receiving standard epirubicin and 87·1% (85·6-88·4) of those receiving accelerated epirubicin were free from TTR events. 4358 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis, and no difference was seen in the proportions of patients free from TTR events between the CMF and capecitabine groups (HR 0·98, 95% CI 0·85-1.14; stratified p=0·00092 for non-inferiority). Compared with baseline, significantly more patients taking CMF than those taking capecitabine had clinically relevant worsening of quality of life at end of treatment (255 [58%] of 441 vs 235 [50%] of 475; p=0·011) and at 12 months (114 [34%] of 334 vs 89 [22%] of 401; p<0·001 at 12 months) and had worse quality of life over time (p<0·0001). Detailed toxicity and quality-of-life data were collected from 2115 (48%) of treated patients. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events in cycles 1-4 were neutropenia (175 [16%]) and fatigue (56 [5%]) of the 1070 patients treated with standard epirubicin, and fatigue (63 [6%]) and infection (34 [3%]) of the 1045 patients treated with accelerated epirubicin. In cycles 5-8, the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (321 [31%]) and fatigue (109 [11%]) in the patients treated with CMF, and hand-foot syndrome (129 [12%]) and diarrhoea (67 [6%]) in the 1044 patients treated with capcitabine.

interpretationWe found no benefit from increasing the dose density of the anthracycline component of chemotherapy. However, capecitabine could be used in place of CMF without significant loss of efficacy and with improved quality of life.

fundingCancer Research UK, Amgen, Pfizer, and Roche.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleCapecitabineCarcinomaChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideDiarrheaDisease-Free SurvivalEpirubicinFatigueFemaleFilgrastimFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesCapecitabineCyclophosphamideEpirubicinFilgrastimFluorouracilGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorMethotrexatepegfilgrastimPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28600210
PMCPMC5489700
OpenAlexW2621656000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.