Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600106›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2017

Genetic analysis of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome in a large cohort of families.

Lacey S Williams, Durkadin Demir Eksi, Yiping Shen, Amy C Lossie, Lynn P Chorich, Megan E Sullivan, John A Phillips, Munire Erman, Hyung-Goo Kim, Ozgul M Alper and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Options for acquiring motherhood in absolute uterine factor infertility; adoption, surrogacy and uterine transplantation.The obstetrician & gynaecologist : the journal for continuing professional development from the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lacey S WilliamsSection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, and Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
Durkadin Demir EksiDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Yiping ShenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Guangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China; Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Amy C LossieBeautiful You MRKH Foundation, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Lynn P ChorichSection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, and Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
Megan E SullivanSection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, and Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
John A PhillipsDivision of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Munire ErmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Hyung-Goo KimSection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, and Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
Ozgul M AlperDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.
Lawrence C LaymanSection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, and Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia; Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia; Department of Physiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia. Electronic address: lalayman@augusta.edu.
Augusta University · USAkdeniz University · TRHarvard University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Genetics of Delayed Puberty.R01HD033004 · NICHD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI LAYMAN, LAWRENCE C · 2003 to 2014
$3.1M
GENETICS OF DELAYED PUBERTYR29HD033004 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LAYMAN, LAWRENCE C · 1997 to 2001
$213k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD033004NICHD NIH HHS R29 HD033004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the genetic cause of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Although a few candidate genes and genomic domains for have been reported for MRKH, the genetic underpinnings remain largely unknown. Some of the top candidate genes are WNT4, HNF1B, and LHX1. The goals of this study were to: 1) determine the prevalence of WNT4, HNF1B, and LHX1 point mutations, as well as new copy number variants (CNVs) in people with MRKH; and 2) identify and characterize MRKH cohorts.

designLaboratory- and community-based study.

settingAcademic medical centers. PATIENT(S): A total of 147 MRKH probands and available family members. INTERVENTIONS(S): DNA sequencing of WNT4, HNF1B, and LHX1 in 100 MRKH patients, chromosomal microarray analysis in 31 North American MRKH patients, and characterization and sample collection of 147 North American and Turkish MRKH probands and their families. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): DNA sequence variants and CNVs; pedigree structural analysis. RESULT(S): We report finding CNVs in 6/31 people (∼19%) with MRKH, but no point mutations or small indels in WNT4, HNF1B, or LHX1 in 100 MRKH patients. Our MRKH families included 43 quads, 26 trios, and 30 duos. Of our MRKH probands, 87/147 (59%) had MRKH type 1 and 60/147 (41%) had type 2 with additional anomalies. CONCLUSION(S): Although the prevalence of WNT4, HNF1B, and LHX1 point mutations is low in people with MRKH, the prevalence of CNVs was ∼19%. Further analysis of our large familial cohort of patients will facilitate gene discovery to better understand the complex etiology of MRKH.

Indexed as

46, XX Disorders of Sex DevelopmentAdultCohort StudiesCongenital AbnormalitiesFamilyGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-betaHumansInternationalityLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsMullerian DuctsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrevalenceRisk FactorsTranscription FactorsGenetic MarkersHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-betaHNF1B protein, humanLHX1 protein, humanLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsTranscription FactorsWnt4 ProteinWNT4 protein, humancongenital absence of the uterus and vaginagene mutationMRKHMüllerian aplasiareproductive genetics

Identifiers

PMID28600106
PMCPMC5770980
OpenAlexW2621531517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.