Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599763›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association

Beliefs about Genetically Targeted Care in African Americans.

Chanita Hughes Halbert, Jasmine A McDonald, Gayenell Magwood, Melanie Jefferson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Equity in Genomic Medicine.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. APOL1 Genetic Testing in Living Kidney Transplant Donors.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2019
    Review
  7. Genomic medicine for kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chanita Hughes HalbertDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Health Equity and Rural Outreach Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Medical Affairs, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: hughesha@musc.edu.
Jasmine A McDonaldDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Gayenell MagwoodCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Melanie JeffersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

Sociobiological Responses to Stress in Prostate Cancer SurvivorsU54MD010706 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DRAKE, RICHARD R. · 2016 to 2020
$8.0M
African American Participation in Cancer Genetics ResearchR01HG004346 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HUGHES-HALBERT, CHANITA A. · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004346NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD010706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined beliefs about genetically targeted care (GTC) among African American men and women in a hospital-based sample and identified sociodemographic, cultural, and clinical factors having significant independent associations with these beliefs. Specifically, beliefs about GTC were evaluated after respondents were randomly primed with a racial or non-racial cue about race and genetics. Despite priming with a racial or non-racial cue, many respondents had positive beliefs about GTC. But, 49% believed that GTC would limit access to medical treatment, 46% believed that people will not trust GTC, and 20% believed that people like them would not benefit from GTC. Racial and non-racial priming did not have significant associations with negative beliefs about GTC. However, cultural beliefs related to temporal orientation were associated significantly with believing that genetically targeted care will limit access to medical treatment. Greater levels of future temporal orientation were associated with a reduced likelihood of endorsing this belief (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.49, 1.01, p = 0.05). Respondents who had a chronic medical condition had an almost three-fold greater likelihood of believing that they would not benefit from GTC (OR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.00, 8.37, p = 0.05). Greater exposure to information about genetic testing for chronic conditions was also associated with a reduced likelihood of believing that they would not benefit from GTC (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.64, 0.91, p = 0.02). African Americans have diverse beliefs about GTC that should be considered as genetic and genomic services are offered.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanFemaleGenetic TherapyHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrecision MedicineAfrican AmericanBeliefsGenetically targetedMedical care

Identifiers

PMID28599763
PMCPMC5978775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.