Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599666›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

Access to and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets and factors associated with non-use among communities in malaria-endemic areas of Al Hudaydah governorate in the Tihama region, west of Yemen.

Samira M A Al-Eryani, Mohammed A K Mahdy, Abdulsalam M Al-Mekhlafi, Rashad Abdul-Ghani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samira M A Al-EryaniDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen. samiraal@yahoo.com.
Mohammed A K MahdyDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen. alsharaby9@yahoo.com.
Abdulsalam M Al-MekhlafiDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Rashad Abdul-GhaniDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal coverage of the targeted malaria-endemic areas with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) is implemented as one of the key interventions for malaria control and elimination in Yemen. In 2013, through a mass campaign, LLINs were distributed to the targeted communities in Al Hudaydah governorate. This study aimed to assess the ownership of, access to, and use of LLINs. It also aimed to identify factors associated with not using LLINs in malaria-endemic areas of Al Hudaydah in the Tihama region, west of Yemen.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in four districts (Ad Durayhimi, Al Marawi'ah, Al Mansuriyah and Bayt Al Faqiah) in Al Hudaydah during February 2016. A total of 701 households were included in this study. Data on socio-demographic characteristics and availability of LLINs were collected by interview and observation. Four indicators for malaria prevention using LLINs; proportion of households with at least one LLIN, proportion of households with at least one LLIN for every two people, proportion of population with access to LLINs in the surveyed households and proportion of population who slept under LLINs the previous night of the survey were calculated as indicated by Roll Back Malaria Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group. Use to access ratio was assessed. Factors associated with not using LLINs among people with access were also investigated.

resultsOf 701 households with 4900 de facto population, ownership of at least one LLIN was 90.6%, while 24.1% owned at least one for every two people during the survey in 2016. The overall proportion of people with access to LLINs was 51.5% (95% CI 50.1-52.9). Only 19.0% (95% CI 17.9-20.1) slept under LLINs the night before the survey and the overall use to access ratio was 0.37. The proportions of children under 5 years of age with access to and use of LLINs were 13.7 and 42.5%, respectively. On the other hand, the proportions of pregnant women with access to and use of LLINs were 16.4 and 20.0%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified that people living in Al Mansuriyah district [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI)  1.35-8.01; P = 0.009)], having three or more damaged LLINs in the house (AOR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.79-4.25; P < 0.001), aged between 16 and 45 years old (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.26-3.75; P = 0.005) or older (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.09-4.29; P = 0.026) and living in huts (AOR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.09-2.32; P = 0.015) were significantly less likely to use LLINs.

conclusionsThis study shows a low LLIN access rate among local communities targeted for universal LLIN coverage in Al Hudaydah, a malaria-endemic area of high transmission. This finding necessitates additional distribution channels following mass campaigns to maintain the universal coverage. Reduced use of LLINs among people with access in these communities together with the identified risks of non-use highlight the importance of conducting behaviour change communication campaigns to enhance using LLINs in areas with universal coverage.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEndemic DiseasesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMaleMiddle AgedAl HudaydahLLIN accessLLIN ownershipLLIN useLong-lasting insecticidal netTihama

Identifiers

PMID28599666
PMCPMC5466721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.