Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599662›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2017

A randomized controlled pilot study to evaluate the effect of an enteral formulation designed to improve gastrointestinal tolerance in the critically ill patient-the SPIRIT trial.

Stephan M Jakob, Lukas Bütikofer, David Berger, Michael Coslovsky, Jukka Takala

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01581957 (A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Specific Enteral Formulation Designed to Improve Gastrointestinal Tolerance in the Critically Ill Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01581957 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Specific Enteral Formulation Designed to Improve Gastrointestinal Tolerance in the Critically Ill Patient

TypeinterventionalSponsorSociété des Produits Nestlé (SPN)Ran2012 to 2014Enrolled90ConditionsCritically IllArmsSpecific Enteral Nutrition, Standard Enteral Nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephan M JakobDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland. Stephan.jakob@insel.ch.
Lukas BütikoferCTU Bern, and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
David BergerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland.
Michael CoslovskyCTU Bern, and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jukka TakalaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiarrhea is frequent in patients in intensive care units (ICU) and is associated with discomfort and complications and may increase the length of stay and nursing workload.

methodsThis was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled single-center pilot study to assess the incidence and frequency of diarrhea and the respective effects of a modified enteral diet (intervention: Peptamen® AF, rich in proteins, medium chain triglycerides and fish oil) compared to a standard diet (control: Isosource® Energy) in 90 randomized adult patients (intervention, n = 46; control, n = 44) with an ICU stay ≥5 days and tube feeding ≥3 days. Tube feeding was initiated within 72 h of ICU admission and continued up to 10 days. The caloric goal was adjusted to needs by indirect calorimetry. Gastrointestinal function, nutritional intake, and nursing workload were recorded. Follow-up was until 28 days after randomization.

resultsMedian age was 63.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 51.0-73.2) years and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II was 61.0 (IQR 47.8-74). Time to reach caloric goal (intervention: 2.2 (0.8-3.7) days (median, IQR); control: 2.0 (1.3-2.7) days; p = 0.16), length of time on study nutrition (intervention: 5.0 (3.6-6.4) days; control: 7.0 (5.3-8.7) days; p = 0.26), and calorie intake (intervention: 18.0 (12.5-20.9) kcal/kg/day; control 19.7 (17.3-23.1) kcal/kg/day; p = 0.08) did not differ between groups, with a higher protein intake for Peptamen® group (1.13 (0.78-1.31) g/kg/day vs 0.80 (0.70-0.94); p < 0.001). No difference in diarrhea incidence (intervention group: 29 (64%); control group: 31 (70%); p = 0.652), use of fecal collectors (23 (51%) vs. 24 (55%); p = 0.83), or diarrhea-free days (161 (64%) vs 196 (68%); p = 0.65) was found. Nursing workload and cost for diarrhea care were not different between the groups. In a post-hoc analysis, adjusted for treatment group, age, sex, and SAPS II score, diarrhea was associated with length of mechanical ventilation (9.5 (6.0-13.1) vs. 3.9 (3.2-4.6) days; p = 0.006) and length of ICU stay (11.0 (8.9-13.1) vs. 5.0 (3.8-6.2) days; p = 0.001).

conclusionsIn this pilot study, we found a high incidence of diarrhea, which was not attenuated by Peptamen® AF. Patients with diarrhea stayed longer in the ICU.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01581957 . Registered on 18 April 2012.

Indexed as

AgedCritical IllnessDiarrheaDouble-Blind MethodEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCritically illDiarrheaEnteral nutritionIntensive care

Identifiers

PMID28599662
PMCPMC5466775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.