Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599647›Full record

Trial reportBMC complementary and alternative medicine2017

Association of lumbar spine stiffness and flexion-relaxation phenomenon with patient-reported outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain - a single-arm clinical trial investigating the effects of thrust spinal manipulation.

Ting Xia, Cynthia R Long, Robert D Vining, Maruti R Gudavalli, James W DeVocht, Gregory N Kawchuk, David G Wilder, Christine M Goertz

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01670292 nacompletednot on this map

Patient Response to Spinal Manipulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorPalmer College of ChiropracticRan2012 to 2014Enrolled82ConditionsLow Back PainArmsHVLA-SM
NCT04744883 early_phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Specific and Non-Specific Mechanisms in Two Distinct Complementary/Integrative Interventions for Chronic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2020 to 2026Enrolled140ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsSpinal Manipulation Therapy (SMT), Naloxone, Placebo, Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction Therapy (MT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The flexion relaxation phenomenon in nonspecific chronic low back pain: prevalence, reproducibility and flexion-extension ratios. A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Age-dependent flexion relaxation phenomenon in chronic low back pain patients.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ting XiaPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA. ting.xia@palmer.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4113-1050
Cynthia R LongPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
Robert D ViningPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
Maruti R GudavalliPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
James W DeVochtPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
Gregory N KawchukDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
David G WilderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Christine M GoertzPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA.
Palmer College of Chiropractic · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Developmental Center for Clinical and Translational Science in ChiropracticU19AT004663 · NCCIH · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI GOERTZ, CHRISTINE MARIE · 2008 to 2013
$3.6M
RENOVATION OF PALMER CENTER FOR CHIROPRACTIC RESEARCHC06RR015433 · NCRR · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI MEEKER, WILLIAM C · 2000 to 2000
$1.3M
NCCIH NIH HHS U19 AT004663NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal manipulation (SM) is used commonly for treating low back pain (LBP). Spinal stiffness is routinely assessed by clinicians performing SM. Flexion-relaxation ratio (FRR) was shown to distinguish between LBP and healthy populations. The primary objective of this study was to examine the association of these two physiological variables with patient-reported pain intensity and disability in adults with chronic LBP (>12 weeks) receiving SM.

methodsA single-arm trial provided 12 sessions of side-lying thrust SM in the lumbosacral region over 6 weeks. Inclusion criteria included 21-65 years old, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score ≥ 6 and numerical pain rating score ≥ 2. Spinal stiffness and FRR were assessed pre-treatment at baseline, after 2 weeks and after 6 weeks of treatment. Lumbar spine global stiffness (GS) were calculated from the force-displacement curves obtained using i) hand palpation, ii) a hand-held device, and iii) an automated indenter device. Lumbar FRR was assessed during trunk flexion-extension using surface electromyography. The primary outcomes were RMDQ and pain intensity measured by visual analog scale (VAS). Mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze the data.

resultsThe mean age of the 82 participants was 45 years; 48% were female; and 84% reported LBP >1 year. The mean (standard deviation) baseline pain intensity and RMDQ were 46.1 (18.1) and 9.5 (4.3), respectively. The mean reduction (95% confidence interval) after 6 weeks in pain intensity and RMDQ were 20.1 mm (14.1 to 26.1) and 4.8 (3.7 to 5.8). There was a small change over time in the palpatory GS but not in the hand-held or automated GS, nor in FRR. The addition of each physiologic variable did not affect the model-estimated changes in VAS or RMDQ over time. There was no association seen between physiological variables and LBP intensity. Higher levels of hand-held GS at L3 and automated GS were significantly associated with higher levels of RMDQ (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively) and lower levels of flexion and extension FRR were significantly associated with higher levels of RMDQ (p = 0.02 and 0.008, respectively) across the 3 assessment time points.

conclusionsImprovement in pain and disability observed in study participants with chronic LBP was not associated with the measured GS or FRR.

trial registrationNCT01670292 on clinicaltrials.gov, August 2, 2012.

Indexed as

Manipulation, SpinalAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansLow Back PainLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPliabilityRelaxationYoung AdultChronic low back painComplementary and alternative medicineDisabilityFlexion-relaxation phenomenonInstrument-assisted assessmentPain intensitySpinal manipulationSpinal stiffness

Identifiers

PMID28599647
PMCPMC5466774
OpenAlexW2624377551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.