Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599645›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Associations between perceptions of care and women's childbirth experience: a population-based cross-sectional study in Rwanda.

Judith U Mukamurigo, Marie Berg, Joseph Ntaganira, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Anna Dencker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Maternal-infant outcomes of birth planning: A review study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Judith U MukamurigoInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box, 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. judith.mukamurigo@gu.se.
Marie BergInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box, 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Joseph NtaganiraCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Laetitia NyirazinyoyeCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Anna DenckerInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box, 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Rwanda · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years Rwanda has achieved remarkable improvement in quality of maternity care services but there is evidence of deficiencies in care quality in terms of disrespectful care. Women's overall childbirth experience is an important outcome of childbirth and a factor in assessing quality of care. The aim of this study was to investigate how women's overall childbirth experience in Rwanda was related to their perceptions of childbirth care.

methodsA cross-sectional household study of women who had given birth 1-13 months earlier (n = 921) was performed in the Northern Province and in the capital city. Data was collected via structured interviews following a questionnaire. Significant variables measuring perceptions of care were included in a stepwise forward selection logistic regression model with overall childbirth experience as a dichotomised target variable to find independent predictors of a good childbirth experience.

resultsThe majority of women (77.5%) reported a good overall childbirth experience. In a logistic regression model five factors of perceived care were significant independent predictors of a good experience: confidence in staff (Adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.20-2.49), receiving enough information (AOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.00), being treated with respect (AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.43), getting support from staff (AOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.20-2.56), and having the baby skin-to-skin after birth (AOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.52-3.19).

conclusionsTo further improve childbirth care in Rwanda and care for women according to their preferences, it is important to make sure that the childbirth care includes the following quality aspects in national and clinical guidelines: build confidence, provide good information, treat women and families with respect, provide good professional support during childbirth and put the newborn baby skin-to-skin with its mother early after birth.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicKangaroo-Mother Care MethodMiddle AgedParturitionPatient Education as TopicPerceptionChildbirthExperienceQuality of careRwandaWomen

Identifiers

PMID28599645
PMCPMC5466750
OpenAlexW2623399067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.