Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599637›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Recruitment of racial/ethnic minority older adults through community sites for focus group discussions.

Mary E Northridge, Michele Shedlin, Eric W Schrimshaw, Ivette Estrada, Leydis De La Cruz, Rogelina Peralta, Stacia Birdsall, Sara S Metcalf, Bibhas Chakraborty, Carol Kunzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advancing Aging Research Through a Health Disparities Perspective.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Planning for a Healthy Aging Program to Reduce Sedentary Behavior: Perceptions among Diverse Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Disparities in Access to Oral Health Care.Annual review of public health · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. "Seniors only want respect": designing an oral health program for older adults.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mary E NorthridgeDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, 433 First Avenue, 7th Floor, Room 726, New York, NY, 10010, USA. men6@nyu.edu.
Michele ShedlinNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Eric W SchrimshawDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Ivette EstradaDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Leydis De La CruzColumbia University College of Dental Medicine, Section of Population Oral Health, New York, NY, USA.
Rogelina PeraltaColumbia University College of Dental Medicine, Section of Population Oral Health, New York, NY, USA.
Stacia BirdsallNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Sara S MetcalfDepartment of Geography, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Bibhas ChakrabortyDuke-National University of Singapore (Duke-NUS) Medical School, Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.
Carol KunzelDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Holly Hagan · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
Integrating Social and Systems Science Approaches to Promote Oral Health EquityR01DE023072 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KUNZEL, CAROL, METCALF, SARA · 2012 to 2016
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000040NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a body of evidence on racial/ethnic minority enrollment and retention in research, literature specifically focused on recruiting racially/ethnically diverse older adults for social science studies is limited. There is a need for more rigorous research on methodological issues and the efficacy of recruitment methods. Cultural obstacles to recruitment of racial/ethnic minority older adults include language barriers, lack of cultural sensitivity of target communities on the part of researchers, and culturally inappropriate assessment tools.

methodsGuided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study critically appraised the recruitment of racial/ethnic minority older adults for focus groups. The initial approach involved using the physical and social infrastructure of the ElderSmile network, a community-based initiative to promote oral and general health and conduct health screenings in places where older adults gather, to recruit racial/ethnic minority adults for a social science component of an interdisciplinary initiative. The process involved planning a recruitment strategy, engaging the individuals involved in its implementation (opinion leaders in senior centers, program staff as implementation leaders, senior community-based colleagues as champions, and motivated center directors as change agents), executing the recruitment plan, and reflecting on the process of implementation.

resultsWhile the recruitment phase of the study was delayed by 6 months to allow for ongoing recruitment and filling of focus group slots, the flexibility of the recruitment plan, the expertise of the research team members, the perseverance of the recruitment staff, and the cultivation of change agents ultimately resulted in meeting the study targets for enrollment in terms of both numbers of focus group discussions (n = 24) and numbers of participants (n = 194).

conclusionsThis study adds to the literature in two important ways. First, we leveraged the social and physical infrastructure of an existing program to recruit participants through community sites where older adults gather. Second, we used the CFIR to guide the appraisal of the recruitment process, which underscored important considerations for both reaching and engaging this underserved population. This was especially true in terms of understanding the disparate roles of the individuals involved in implementing and facilitating the recruitment plan.

Indexed as

EthnicityFocus GroupsMinority GroupsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonnel SelectionResearch DesignAfrican AmericansAgingHealth equityHispanicsImplementation scienceRecruitment strategiesSocial science

Identifiers

PMID28599637
PMCPMC5466755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.