ArticleOncology letters2017
Use of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment following chemotherapy with folfirinox for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04133155 (Multicenter Retrospective Analysis for Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine After Progression on 1st-line FOLFIRINOX in Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Retrospective Analysis for Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine After Progression on 1st-line FOLFIRINOX in Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Second-Line Systemic Therapy Following First-Line FOLFIRINOX or NALIRIFOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Niclosamide nanoparticles enhance pancreatic cancer sensitivity to gemcitabine via HIF-1α inhibition.iScience · 2025Article
- Efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic analysis and outcomes of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as second or later-line treatment.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Systemic treatments in pancreatic cancer: Taiwan pancreas society recommendation.Biomedical journal · 2024Review
- French multi-institutional cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxelTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- Large-Scale Machine Learning Analysis Reveals DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Response Signatures for Gemcitabine-Treated Pancreatic Cancer.Health data science · 2024Article
- Starvation mediates pancreatic cancer cell sensitivity to ferroptosis via ERK1/2, JNK and changes in the cell mesenchymal state.International journal of molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel or Gemcitabine alone after FOLFIRINOX failure in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real-world AGEO study.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- The clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2022Article
- Towards an updated view on the clinical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Current and future perspectives.Oncology letters · 2021Review
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Beyond first line, where are we?World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Systemic therapy in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: current practice and perspectives.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2021Review
- Analysis of Clinical Predictive Factors Affecting the Outcome of Second-Line Chemotherapy for Gemcitabine-Refractory Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.Gut and liver · 2020Article
- Review
- Observational Study of Clinical Practice in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Greece.Journal of oncology · 2020Article
- Efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine after progression on FOLFIRINOX for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: multicenter retrospective analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Article
- Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Is There a Role for Gemcitabine?Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2019Article
- Second-Line Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after First-Line FOLFIRINOX Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a lack of prospective data about second-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. This is partially due to recent changes in first-line chemotherapy treatments. Despite this dearth of information, 50.0% of the patients who experience failure with first-line folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (folfirinox) treatment are eligible for additional chemotherapy. In this setting, gemcitabine is widely used without any standard recommendations available. The present study evaluated 42 patients who received gemcitabine subsequent to a first-line treatment of folfirinox between January 2008 and December 2012 at the Centre Léon Bérard (Lyon, France). Clinical data, biological data and tumor characteristics were retrospectively analyzed to identify prognostic factors for successful treatment with gemcitabine. In total, 11 patients (26.2%) experienced control of their cancer with gemcitabine treatment. However, there was no predictive marker for their response to the drug. The median overall survival was 3.6 months from gemcitabine initiation [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-5.1]. The median length of gemcitabine treatment was 1.5 months (95% CI, 0.3-13.3). Among the 11 patients who were successfully treated with gemcitabine, 6 were resistant to first-line folfirinox treatment. Patients who were non responsive to folfirinox had a higher probability of success with gemcitabine compared with patients that responded to folfirinox (54.5 vs. 21.4%, respectively; P=0.061). The present study did not identify any clinical or biological marker with a predictive value for successful gemcitabine treatment. Furthermore, successful gemcitabine treatment was not correlated with patients' response to first-line folfirinox treatment. This suggests an absence of cross-resistance in the chemotherapy protocols and provides evidence for effective cancer treatment with the second-line gemcitabine therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.