Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599492›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2017

Histological evaluations of primary lesions are independently associated with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Tomomitsu Tahara, Tomoyuki Shibata, Masaaki Okubo, Dai Yoshida, Tomohiko Kawamura, Noriyuki Horiguchi, Takamitsu Ishizuka, Mitsuo Nagasaka, Yoshihito Nakagawa, Naoki Ohmiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tomomitsu TaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Tomoyuki ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Masaaki OkuboDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Dai YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Tomohiko KawamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Noriyuki HoriguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Takamitsu IshizukaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Mitsuo NagasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Yoshihito NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Naoki OhmiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). To explore useful predictive factors for the response of advanced GC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor responses were assessed using computed tomography (CT) with histological based criteria. A total of 78 patients with advanced GC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. CT-based response assessment was performed following 2 courses of treatment. Histological evaluation of resected specimens was also performed according to the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Grade 1b, 2 and 3 (viable tumor cells remaining in <2/3 of the tumorous area) were defined as histological responders. The results were associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The majority of the cases underwent tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil based preoperative chemotherapy as the first line of treatment (n=76, 96%). A total of 25 (32%) and 29 (37%) cases were considered to be CT and histological responders, respectively. CT-based evaluation was not associated with OS or PFS, while histological evaluation was significantly associated with OS and PFS. Histological based evaluation was not associated with CT and GI X-ray or endoscopy-based evaluation of primary lesions. Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model demonstrated that histological non-response was an independent prognostic factor for predicting worse OS. Histological-based evaluation of primary lesions was independently associated with prognosis in patients with GC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

gastric cancerhistological evaluationneoadjuvant chemotherapyoverall survival progression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID28599492
PMCPMC5453053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.