Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599156›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2017

Mechanical response of human female breast skin under uniaxial stretching.

N Kumaraswamy, Hamed Khatam, Gregory P Reece, Michelle C Fingeret, Mia K Markey, Krishnaswamy Ravi-Chandar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterization of human female breast and abdominal skin elasticity using a bulge test.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2020
    Article
  9. Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N KumaraswamyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Hamed KhatamDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Gregory P ReeceDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Michelle C FingeretDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Mia K MarkeyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Krishnaswamy Ravi-ChandarDepartment of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States. Electronic address: ravi@utexas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

3-D modeling-based decision support for optimizing quality of life following breast reconstructionR01CA203984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K, MERCHANT, FATIMA AZIZ · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
3-D Computer Modeling for Optimizing Body Image following Breast ReconstructionR01CA143190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143190NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin is a complex material covering the entire surface of the human body. Studying the mechanical properties of skin to calibrate a constitutive model is of great importance to many applications such as plastic or cosmetic surgery and treatment of skin-based diseases like decubitus ulcers. The main objective of the present study was to identify and calibrate an appropriate material constitutive model for skin and establish certain universal properties that are independent of patient-specific variability. We performed uniaxial tests performed on breast skin specimens freshly harvested during mastectomy. Two different constitutive models - one phenomenological and another microstructurally inspired - were used to interpret the mechanical responses observed in the experiments. Remarkably, we found that the model parameters that characterize dependence on previous maximum stretch (or preconditioning) exhibited specimen-independent universal behavior.

Indexed as

Skin Physiological PhenomenaStress, MechanicalBiomechanical PhenomenaBreastFemaleHumansModels, BiologicalSkinHart-Smith modelMechanical testingRausch-Humphrey's model

Identifiers

PMID28599156
PMCPMC5582008
OpenAlexW2614272033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.