Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28599006›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Long-term cryopreservation of decellularised oesophagi for tissue engineering clinical application.

Luca Urbani, Panagiotis Maghsoudlou, Anna Milan, Maria Menikou, Charlotte Klara Hagen, Giorgia Totonelli, Carlotta Camilli, Simon Eaton, Alan Burns, Alessandro Olivo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cryopreservation of biological materials: applications and economic perspectives.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tissue Engineering for Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Tracts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luca UrbaniGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Panagiotis MaghsoudlouGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Anna MilanGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3397-6563
Maria MenikouGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte Klara HagenDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Giorgia TotonelliGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Carlotta CamilliGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Simon EatonGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Alan BurnsGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Alessandro OlivoDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Paolo De CoppiGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP_2014-04-046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oesophageal tissue engineering is a therapeutic alternative when oesophageal replacement is required. Decellularised scaffolds are ideal as they are derived from tissue-specific extracellular matrix and are non-immunogenic. However, appropriate preservation may significantly affect scaffold behaviour. Here we aim to prove that an effective method for short- and long-term preservation can be applied to tissue engineered products allowing their translation to clinical application. Rabbit oesophagi were decellularised using the detergent-enzymatic treatment (DET), a combination of deionised water, sodium deoxycholate and DNase-I. Samples were stored in phosphate-buffered saline solution at 4°C (4°C) or slow cooled in medium with 10% Me2SO at -1°C/min followed by storage in liquid nitrogen (SCM). Structural and functional analyses were performed prior to and after 2 and 4 weeks and 3 and 6 months of storage under each condition. Efficient decellularisation was achieved after 2 cycles of DET as determined with histology and DNA quantification, with preservation of the ECM. Only the SCM method, commonly used for cell storage, maintained the architecture and biomechanical properties of the scaffold up to 6 months. On the contrary, 4°C method was effective for short-term storage but led to a progressive distortion and degradation of the tissue architecture at the following time points. Efficient storage allows a timely use of decellularised oesophagi, essential for clinical translation. Here we describe that slow cooling with cryoprotectant solution in liquid nitrogen vapour leads to reliable long-term storage of decellularised oesophageal scaffolds for tissue engineering purposes.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEsophagusTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsChickensCryoprotective AgentsExtracellular MatrixHumansModels, AnimalRabbitsCryoprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID28599006
PMCPMC5466304
OpenAlexW2622383747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.