Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28598950›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2017

Drill-induced Cochlear Injury During Otologic Surgery: Intracochlear Pressure Evidence of Acoustic Trauma.

Renee M Banakis Hartl, Jameson K Mattingly, Nathaniel T Greene, Nyssa F Farrell, Samuel P Gubbels, Daniel J Tollin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk of hearing loss in the opposite ear after tympanomastoidectomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Extracellular vesicles for developing targeted hearing loss therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of Varying Laser Parameters During Laser Stapedotomy on Intracochlear Pressures.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  10. Risks of Intracochlear Pressures From Laser Stapedotomy.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2020
    Article
  11. Characterizing Insertion Pressure Profiles During Cochlear Implantation: Simultaneous Fluoroscopy and Intracochlear Pressure Measurements.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2020
    Article
  12. Post-operative Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Middle Ear Surgery.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2019
    Article
  13. Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: Effect of Micro-mechanical Control on Limiting Pressure Trauma.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2019
    Article
  14. Lateral Semicircular Canal Pressures During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: a Possible Mechanism for Postoperative Vestibular Loss.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renee M Banakis Hartl*Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado †Auditory Protection and Performance Division, U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Lab, Fort Rucker, Alabama ‡Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Jameson K Mattingly
Nathaniel T Greene
Nyssa F Farrell
Samuel P Gubbels
Daniel J Tollin
University of Colorado Denver · USUnited States Army Aeromedical Research Lab · US

Funding

Institutional Training in Otolaryngology ResearchT32DC012280 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Yuri Agrawal, Sue C. Kinnamon · 2013 to 2026
$3.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC012280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisDrilling on the incus produces intracochlear pressure changes comparable to pressures created by high-intensity acoustic stimuli.

backgroundNew-onset sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) following mastoid surgery can occur secondary to inadvertent drilling on the ossicular chain. To investigate this, we test the hypothesis that high sound pressure levels are generated when a high-speed drill contacts the incus.

methodsHuman cadaveric heads underwent mastoidectomy, and fiber-optic sensors were placed in scala tympani and vestibuli to measure intracochlear pressures (PIC). Stapes velocities (Vstap) were measured using single-axis laser Doppler vibrometry. PIC and Vstap were measured while drilling on the incus. Four-millimeter diamond and cutting burrs were used at drill speeds of 20k, 50k, and 80k Hz.

resultsNo differences in peak equivalent ear canal noise exposures (134-165 dB SPL) were seen between drill speeds or burr types. Root-mean-square PIC amplitude calculated in third-octave bandwidths around 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz revealed equivalent ear canal (EAC) pressures up to 110 to 112 dB SPL. A statistically significant trend toward increasing noise exposure with decreasing drill speed was seen. No significant differences were noted between burr types. Calculations of equivalent EAC pressure from Vstap were significantly higher at 101 to 116 dB SPL.

conclusionOur results suggest that incidental drilling on the ossicular chain can generate PIC comparable to high-intensity acoustic stimulation. Drill speed, but not burr type, significantly affected the magnitude of PIC. Inadvertent drilling on the ossicular chain produces intense cochlear stimulation that could cause SNHL.

Indexed as

Surgical EquipmentCadaverCochleaEar OssiclesHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansIatrogenic DiseaseIncusMaleOtologic Surgical ProceduresPressureStapesTemporal Bone

Identifiers

PMID28598950
PMCPMC5535777
OpenAlexW2623137645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.