Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28598582›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2017

Outcomes of Intercalary Prosthetic Reconstruction for Pathological Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures Secondary to Metastatic Tumors.

Hong-Chao Huang, Yong-Cheng Hu, Deng-Xing Lun, Jun Miao, Feng Wang, Xiong-Gang Yang, Xin-Long Ma

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intercalary Diaphyseal Endoprosthetic Reconstruction.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-Chao HuangThe Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yong-Cheng HuDepartment of Bone Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Deng-Xing LunDepartment of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
Jun MiaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Feng WangThe Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xiong-Gang YangThe Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xin-Long MaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University · CNWeifang People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of segmental prosthetic reconstruction for pathological diaphyseal femoral fractures secondary to metastatic tumors.

methodsBetween 2011 and 2015, we retrospectively evaluated 16 patients (6 men and 10 women; 64.5 ± 11.4 years old at diagnosis) who underwent prosthetic reconstruction after segmental resection of diaphyseal femoral fractures due to metastatic lesions. Visual analog scale (VAS), functional outcomes, implant-related complications, and Mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score for each patient were collected.

resultsThe mean length of bone defect was 10.2 ± 2.6 cm (range, 8-16 cm); follow-up was 9 ± 6.8 months (range, 2-25 months) for all patients, and 24 months (23 and 25 months) for the 2 patients still alive. At final follow-up, 14 patients were dead, indicating a mean survival of 6.9 ± 3.6 months (range, 2-14 months). Mean preoperative VAS score was 8.5 ± 1.0, which decreased to 2.5 ± 1.3 at day 2 postoperatively, indicating significant pain relief (P < 0.05). The MSTS score for lower extremities was 84.6% (range, 73%-90%). The range of motion and function of adjacent joints was within the normal limits in all cases. Three patients (33%) developed complications, including aseptic loosening because of disease progression (1), infection (1), and peri-prosthesis fracture (1).

conclusionThese findings demonstrated that this approach greatly relieves pain, and yields satisfactory functional outcomes with fewer complications in patients with pathological femoral fractures secondary to metastatic tumors; however, survival was not significantly improved.

Indexed as

FemaleFemoral FracturesFemoral NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, SpontaneousHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDiaphyseal femoral fractureFunctional outcomeIntercalary prosthesesMetastatic tumors

Identifiers

PMID28598582
PMCPMC6584426
OpenAlexW2623596506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.