Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28598372›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Evaluation of the Cardiotoxicity of Evodiamine In Vitro and In Vivo.

Weifeng Yang, Lina Ma, Sidi Li, Kaiyu Cui, Lei Lei, Zuguang Ye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cardio-Oncology: Mechanisms, Drug Combinations, and Reverse Cardio-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Research progress on evodiamine, a bioactive alkaloid ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weifeng YangExperimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China. sunzhuyang@126.com.
Lina MaInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China. malina8512@163.com.
Sidi LiInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China. lisidimaa@aliyun.com.
Kaiyu CuiPharmacy Faculty, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China. cky1555@sina.com.
Lei LeiInstitute of Information on TCM, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China. sophlei@hotmail.com.
Zuguang YeInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China. yezuguang@sina.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHubei University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evodiamine is a bioactive alkaloid that is specified as a biomarker for the quality assessment of

Indexed as

AldehydesAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrugs, Chinese HerbalEvodiaFruitHeart RateHumansL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMyocytes, CardiacOxidative StressPlant ExtractsPrimary Cell CultureQuinazolinesAldehydesDrugs, Chinese HerbalevodiamineL-Lactate DehydrogenasemalealdehydePlant ExtractsQuinazolinesSuperoxide Dismutasecardiotoxicityevodiamineoxidative stressprimary cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocyteszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28598372
PMCPMC6152646
OpenAlexW2621293428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.