Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28597879›Full record

ArticleChemical communications (Cambridge, England)2017

To cage or to be caged? The cytotoxic species in ruthenium-based photoactivated chemotherapy is not always the metal.

Jordi-Amat Cuello-Garibo, Michael S Meijer, Sylvestre Bonnet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ruthenium-Based Photoactivated Chemotherapy.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Steric hindrance, ligand ejection and associated photocytotoxic properties of ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Not AllInorganic chemistry · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordi-Amat Cuello-GariboLeiden Institute of Chemistry, University of Leiden, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands. bonnet@chem.leidenuniv.nl.
Michael S Meijer
Sylvestre Bonnet
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In metal-based photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT), two photoproducts are generated by light-triggered photosubstitution of a metal-bound ligand: the free ligand itself and an aquated metal complex. By analogy with cisplatin, the aquated metal complex is usually presented as the biologically active species, as it can typically bind to DNA. In this work, we show that this qualitative assumption is not necessarily valid by comparing the biological activity, log P, and cellular uptake of three ruthenium-based PACT complexes: [Ru(bpy)

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCoordination ComplexesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansLigandsMolecular StructurePhotosensitizing AgentsRutheniumStructure-Activity RelationshipAntineoplastic AgentsCoordination ComplexesLigandsPhotosensitizing AgentsRuthenium

Identifiers

PMID28597879
PMCPMC5708332
OpenAlexW2622837617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.