Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28597816›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology spectrum2017

Sex and the Imperfect Fungi.

Paul S Dyer, Ulrich Kück

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology spectrum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Population genomics reveals meiotic recombination inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. TheFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biological Characteristics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Global Sexual Fertility in the Opportunistic PathogenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul S DyerSchool of Life Sciences, University Park, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
Ulrich KückLehrstuhl für Allgemeine und Molekulare Botanik, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 20% of species in the fungal kingdom are only known to reproduce by asexual means despite the many supposed advantages of sexual reproduction. However, in recent years, sexual cycles have been induced in a series of emblematic "asexual" species. We describe how these discoveries were made, building on observations of evidence for sexual potential or "cryptic sexuality" from population genetic analyses; the presence, distribution, and functionality of mating-type genes; genome analyses revealing the presence of genes linked to sexuality; the functionality of sex-related genes; and formation of sex-related developmental structures. We then describe specific studies that led to the discovery of mating and sex in certain

Indexed as

SexCell CycleEvolution, MolecularFungiGenes, FungalGenes, Mating Type, FungalGenetics, PopulationGenome, FungalHumansRecombination, GeneticReproductionReproduction, AsexualTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28597816
PMCPMC11687501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.