ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2017
Biomechanical evaluation of the risk of secondary fracture around short versus long cephalomedullary nails.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing in Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2026Article
- Treating Intertrochanteric Fracture by Short and Long Cephalomedullary Nail: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2026Article
- 320 mm InterTan nail optimizes biomechanics in AO/OTA 31A2.3 fractures: superior stress distribution, micromotion, and strain for enhanced healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- [Research progress on distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- Is nail-plate docking worth the effort? A biomechanical analysis of docking a plate and a nail in peri-implant femur fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- [Treatment of peri-implant refracture after intramedullary nail fixation for intertrochanteric fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021Article
- Fractures around Trochanteric Nails: The "Vergilius Classification System".Advances in orthopedics · 2021Article
- Outcomes after unstable pertrochanteric femur fracture: intermediate versus long cephalomedullary nails.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFor proximal femur fractures, long cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are often selected to avoid a diaphyseal stress riser at the tip of a shorter nail. Secondary peri-implant fracture rates for long and short CMN have not been shown to differ clinically. This study biomechanically compares both CMN in a cadaveric model.
methodsTen matched pairs of cadaveric femora with short or long CMN were axially loaded and internally rotated to failure.
resultsResulting fractures involved distal interlocking screws of the short and long CMN. Energy and rotation to failure were significantly greater for short CMN. Torque at failure trended higher for short CMN but not significantly. No statistical difference was detected in stiffness of the short and long CMN. DISCUSSION: A greater risk of secondary fracture is not indicated for short versus long CMN under torsional stress. Short CMN may be suitable in the younger patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28597401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.