Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28597349›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2018

Perioperative allogenic blood transfusion is a poor prognostic factor after hepatocellular carcinoma surgery: a multi-center analysis.

Hiroshi Wada, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Hiroaki Nagano, Shoji Kubo, Takuya Nakai, Masaki Kaibori, Michihiro Hayashi, Shigekazu Takemura, Shogo Tanaka, Yasuyuki Nakata and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Usefulness of Infra-hepatic Inferior Vena Cava Clamping During Liver Resection: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi WadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. heguchi@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Hiroaki NaganoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Shoji KuboDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Takuya NakaiDepartment of Surgery, Kinki University School of Medicine, Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Masaki KaiboriDepartment of Surgery, Hirakata Hospital, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
Michihiro HayashiDepartment of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Shigekazu TakemuraDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Shogo TanakaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Yasuyuki NakataDepartment of Surgery, Kinki University School of Medicine, Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Kosuke MatsuiDepartment of Surgery, Hirakata Hospital, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
Morihiko IshizakiDepartment of Surgery, Hirakata Hospital, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
Fumitoshi HirokawaDepartment of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Koji KomedaDepartment of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Kazuhisa UchiyamaDepartment of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Masanori KonDepartment of Surgery, Hirakata Hospital, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JPKansai Medical University · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPOsaka City University · JPKindai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe influence of allogenic blood transfusion on the postoperative outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgery remains controversial. This study aims to clarify the clinical impacts of perioperative allogenic blood transfusion on liver resection outcome in HCC patients.

methodsWe analyzed data collected over 5 years for 642 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC at one of the five university hospitals. We investigated the impact of allogenic blood transfusion on postoperative outcome after surgery in all patients and in 74 matched pairs, using a propensity score.

resultsOf the 642 patients, 198 (30.8%) received perioperative allogenic blood transfusion (AT group) and 444 (69.2%) did not (non-AT group). Overall survival was lower in the AT group than in the non-AT group in univariate (P < 0.001) and multivariate analyses (risk ratio 1.521, P = 0.011). After matching the different distributions using propensity scores, perioperative blood transfusion was found to be a poor prognostic factor for HCC patients.

conclusionsIn this multi-center study, perioperative blood transfusion was an independent factor for poor prognosis after curative surgery for primary HCC in the patient group and in pairs matched by propensity scores.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionPerioperative CareAgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHepatectomyHepatocellular carcinomaPrognosisTransfusion

Identifiers

PMID28597349
OpenAlexW2621917857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.