Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28597307›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2017

Optimization of biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients: outcomes from the CREATE registry after 2 years of follow-up.

Manuel J Cárdenas, Soraya de la Fuente, María C Castro-Villegas, Montserrat Romero-Gómez, Desiré Ruiz-Vílchez, Jerusalem Calvo-Gutiérrez, Alejandro Escudero-Contreras, José R Del Prado, Eduardo Collantes-Estévez, Pilar Font

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Manuel J CárdenasPharmacy Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Av Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain. manuelj.cardenas.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0327-0420
Soraya de la FuentePharmacy Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Av Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
María C Castro-VillegasRheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Montserrat Romero-GómezRheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Desiré Ruiz-VílchezRheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Jerusalem Calvo-GutiérrezRheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Alejandro Escudero-ContrerasRheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
José R Del PradoPharmacy Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Av Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
Eduardo Collantes-EstévezRheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Pilar FontRheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Universitary Hospital, IMIBIC/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current strategy for managing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) focuses on achieving clinical remission. Once remission is achieved and sustained over time, the most efficient strategy is dose optimization. This work describes the results of dose optimization after 2 years of follow-up in patients with RA treated with biological therapy and identifies predictive variables of response. Cohort: patients from the CREATE registry who, as of 1 November 2013, had been in clinical remission (DAS28 ≤2.6) for at least 6 months.

interventionDose optimization was 20-50% of the standard dose. Outcome measurement were effectiveness (percentage of patients who continued to meet criteria for clinical remission) and efficiency (dose reduction and mean savings). Sixty-eight patients with RA were optimized, with initial mean DAS28 of 2.2 ± 0.7. After 2 years of follow-up, the mean DAS28 was 2.4 ± 0.7, a non-statistically significant difference. Twenty-eight patients (41.2%) continued in clinical remission with dose optimization after 2 years. Mean survival time was 14.2 months (95% CI 12.0-16.5). Of the 40 patients who needed to return to a standard dose, 57.5% managed to achieve remission again at 2 years. Mean dose reduction at 2 years was 21.17%, reaching a mean saving of €5576 ± 5099 per patient. In actual clinical practice, over 40% of patients with established RA who had been in sustained clinical remission managed to continue in remission 2 years after receiving optimized doses. The savings achieved was about 21% of the actual direct health costs for patients in the CREATE registry.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedRegistriesAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsMethotrexateBiological therapyClinical remissionCost-effectivenessOptimizationReal clinical practiceRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.