Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28597177›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2017

Dynamical Systems Modeling of Couple Interaction: a New Method for Assessing Intervention Impact Across the Transition to Parenthood.

Mark E Feinberg, Mengya Xia, Gregory M Fosco, Richard E Heyman, Sy-Miin Chow

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark E FeinbergPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. mef11@psu.edu.
Mengya XiaHuman Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Gregory M FoscoHuman Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Richard E HeymanFamily Translational Research Group, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Sy-Miin ChowHuman Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Funding

Trial of Transition to Parenting Program for CouplesR01HD058529 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI FEINBERG, MARK ETHAN · 2008 to 2012
$3.5M
Modeling the Dynamics of Early Communication and DevelopmentR01GM105004 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI CHOW, SY-MIIN, COHN, JEFFREY F · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development HD058529National Institutes of Health R01GM105004National Science Foundation SES-1357666NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058529NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the use of dynamical systems modeling techniques to evaluate self- and co-regulation of affect in couples' interactions before and after the transition to parenthood, and the impact of the Family Foundations program on these processes. Thirty-four heterosexual couples, randomized to intervention and control conditions, participated in videotaped dyadic interaction tasks at pretest (during pregnancy) and posttest (1 year after birth). Husbands' and wives' positivity and negativity were micro-coded throughout interactions. Individual negativity set-points, self-regulation, and partner co-regulatory processes during interactions were examined using a coupled oscillators model. Regarding self-regulatory processes, men exhibited amplification of negativity at the prenatal assessment that did not change at the postnatal assessment; women demonstrated no significant damping or amplification at pretest and a marginally significant change towards greater amplification at the postnatal assessment. In terms of partner-influenced regulatory dynamics, men's positive behaviors changed from damping to amplifying women's negative behaviors in the control group following the transition to parenthood, but exerted an even stronger damping effect on women's negative behaviors in the intervention group. The study highlights the advantages of dynamic modeling approaches in testing specific hypotheses in the study of self- and co-regulatory couple dynamics and demonstrates the potential of studying dynamic processes to further understanding of developmental and intervention-related change mechanisms.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsModels, TheoreticalParentsFemaleHumansMalePregnancyCoupled oscillators modelCouple interactionDynamical systems modelingFamily FoundationsFunctional data analysisTransition to parenting

Identifiers

PMID28597177
PMCPMC6402558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.