ArticleDiabetologia2017
Early metabolic markers identify potential targets for the prevention of type 2 diabetes.
Article in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolomics and Type 2 Diabetes Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.Diabetes care · 2022Pooled it
- Metabolite biomarkers of type 2 diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Potential Markers of Dietary Glycemic Exposures for Sustained Dietary Interventions in Populations without Diabetes.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Pooled it
- The phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor sildenafil decreases the proinflammatory chemokine IL-8 in diabetic cardiomyopathy: in vivo and in vitro evidence.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2019Trial
- α-Hydroxybutyrate Association With Incident Type 2 Diabetes Over 10 Years Across Different Glycemic States.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Article
- Plasma 4-Hydroxyproline Levels Are Associated with Diabetes in Chinese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Physiological Regulation of Nutritional and Metabolic Biomarkers in Obesity: Implications for Precision Nutrition.Nutrients · 2026Review
- DeepDiff-SHAP: Interpretable deep learning for subgroup-specific causal hypothesis generation using conditional SHAP.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026Article
- Effects of short-term exercise on plasma metabolic and lipidomic profiles of individuals with type 2 diabetes.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Metabolomics: Uncovering Insights into Obesity and Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Pathways to chronic disease detection and prediction: Mapping the potential of machine learning to the pathophysiological processes while navigating ethical challenges.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Deciphering the causality of gut microbiota, circulating metabolites and heart failure: a mediation mendelian.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Longitudinal clinical and proteomic diabetes signatures in women with a history of gestational diabetes.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Article
- Metabolomics and Lipidomics for Studying Metabolic Syndrome: Insights into Cardiovascular Diseases, Type 1 & 2 Diabetes, and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Physiological research · 2024Review
- Article
- Enzymatic detection of α-hydroxybutyrate, an important marker of insulin resistance, and comparison with LC-MS/MS detection.Practical laboratory medicine · 2024Article
- Multiomics Research: Principles and Challenges in Integrated Analysis.Biodesign research · 2024Review
- Altered Gut Microbiota as a Potential Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease in Diabetes: A Two-Sample Bi-Directional Mendelian Randomization Study.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThe aims of this study were to evaluate systematically the predictive power of comprehensive metabolomics profiles in predicting the future risk of type 2 diabetes, and to identify a panel of the most predictive metabolic markers.
methodsWe applied an unbiased systems medicine approach to mine metabolite combinations that provide added value in predicting the future incidence of type 2 diabetes beyond known risk factors. We performed mass spectrometry-based targeted, as well as global untargeted, metabolomics, measuring a total of 568 metabolites, in a Finnish cohort of 543 non-diabetic individuals from the Botnia Prospective Study, which included 146 individuals who progressed to type 2 diabetes by the end of a 10 year follow-up period. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess statistical associations, and regularised least-squares modelling was used to perform machine learning-based risk classification and marker selection. The predictive performance of the machine learning models and marker panels was evaluated using repeated nested cross-validation, and replicated in an independent French cohort of 1044 individuals including 231 participants who progressed to type 2 diabetes during a 9 year follow-up period in the DESIR (Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome) study.
resultsNine metabolites were negatively associated (potentially protective) and 25 were positively associated with progression to type 2 diabetes. Machine learning models based on the entire metabolome predicted progression to type 2 diabetes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC = 0.77) significantly better than the reference model based on clinical risk factors alone (AUC = 0.68; DeLong's p = 0.0009). The panel of metabolic markers selected by the machine learning-based feature selection also significantly improved the predictive performance over the reference model (AUC = 0.78; p = 0.00019; integrated discrimination improvement, IDI = 66.7%). This approach identified novel predictive biomarkers, such as α-tocopherol, bradykinin hydroxyproline, X-12063 and X-13435, which showed added value in predicting progression to type 2 diabetes when combined with known biomarkers such as glucose, mannose and α-hydroxybutyrate and routinely used clinical risk factors. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThis study provides a panel of novel metabolic markers for future efforts aimed at the prevention of type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.