ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2017
The use of bioactive peptides to modify materials for bone tissue repair.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the Effects of Charge on the Release Kinetics of Charge-Modified Peptides from Gelatin Microparticles.Cell biomaterials · 2026Article
- Biochemical and Physicomechanical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Use of Osteo-Inductive 3D-Printed Scaffolds Covered with a Pleiotrophin Peptide for Bone Defects: An In Vivo Experimental Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanism-Guided Nanoengineered Therapeutic Peptides for Bone Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Advances in extracellular vesicle-based nanomedicine for regenerative orthopaedics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Osteoblastic Differentiation and Mitigation of the Inflammatory Response in Titanium Alloys Decorated with Oligopeptides.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of the Effect of Human Type I Collagen-Derived Peptide on Bone Regenerative Capacity and Comparison with Various Collagen Materials In Vivo.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Recent advances in glycopeptide hydrogels: design, biological functions, and biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- A double-network fish gelatin/sodium alginate composite hydrogel as a carrier for the sustained release of a soy-derived osteogenic peptide.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Synergistic therapy for osteoporosis: a soybean osteogenic peptide-loaded fish gelatin/κ-carrageenan gel for enhanced bone regeneration.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Chitosan-Peptide Composites for Tissue Engineering Applications: Advances in Treatment Strategies.Current protein & peptide science · 2025Review
- Engineering tunable dual peptide hybrid coatings promote osseointegration of implants.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Multi-site enhancement of osteogenesis: peptide-functionalized GelMA hydrogels with three-dimensional cultures of human dental pulp stem cells.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Salivary Gland Bioengineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bioactive Scaffolds as a Promising Alternative for Enhancing Critical-Size Bone Defect Regeneration in the Craniomaxillofacial Region.ACS applied bio materials · 2023Review
- Hst1/Gel-MA Scaffold Significantly Promotes the Quality of Osteochondral Regeneration in the Temporomandibular Joint.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Bioactive Materials for Bone Regeneration: Biomolecules and Delivery Systems.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Review
- Engineered biomaterials in stem cell-based regenerative medicine.Life medicine · 2023Review
- Rheology as a Tool for Fine-Tuning the Properties of Printable Bioinspired Gels.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mussel-inspired biomaterials: From chemistry to clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been well recognized that the modification of biomaterials with appropriate bioactive peptides could further enhance their functions. Especially, it has been shown that peptide-modified bone repair materials could promote new bone formation more efficiently compared with conventional ones. The purpose of this article is to give a general review of recent studies on bioactive peptide-modified materials for bone tissue repair. Firstly, the main peptides for inducing bone regeneration and commonly used methods to prepare peptide-modified bone repair materials are introduced. Then, current
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.