Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28596748›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2017

The Infant Version of the Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (Lab-TAB): Measurement Properties and Implications for Concepts of Temperament.

Elizabeth M Planalp, Carol Van Hulle, Jeffrey R Gagne, H Hill Goldsmith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth M PlanalpDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison, WI, United States.
Carol Van HulleWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison, WI, United States.
Jeffrey R GagneDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at ArlingtonArlington, TX, United States.
H Hill GoldsmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison, WI, United States.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · US

Funding

WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN EMOTION RESEARCHT32MH018931 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Richard J Davidson · 1989 to 2026
$11.6M
Summer Research ExperienceP50MH100031 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KALIN, NED H · 2013 to 2017
$10.4M
STRESS EXPOSURE, HPA ACTIVITY AND RISK FOR ADOLESCENT INTERNALIZING DISORDERSP50MH084051 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOLDSMITH, HAROLD HILL · 2008 to 2012
$9.6M
LONGITUDINAL TWIN STUDIES OF EARLY EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENTR37MH050560 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOLDSMITH, HAROLD HILL · 1997 to 2006
$3.1M
Validating RDoC for Children and Adolescents: A Twin Study with NeuroimagingR01MH101504 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOLDSMITH, HAROLD HILL · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH084051NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH100031NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101504NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH050560NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe large-sample research using the Infant Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (Lab-TAB; Goldsmith and Rothbart, 1996) in 1,076 infants at 6 and 12 months of age. The Lab-TAB was designed to assess temperament dimensions through a series of episodes that mimic everyday situations. Our goal is to provide guidelines for scoring Lab-TAB episodes to derive temperament composites. We also present a set of analyses examining mean differences and stability of temperament in early infancy, gender differences in infant temperament, as well as a validation of Lab-TAB episodes and composites with parent reported Infant Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ; Rothbart, 1981) scales. In general, laboratory observed temperament was only modestly related to parent reported temperament. However, temperament measures were significantly stable across time and several gender differences that align with previous research emerged. In sum, the Lab-TAB usefully assesses individual differences in infant emotionality.

Indexed as

assessmentemotioninfancyLab-TABtemperament

Identifiers

PMID28596748
PMCPMC5442210
OpenAlexW2618701954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.