Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28596635›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2017

An Investigation of Low-Dose 3D Scout Scans for Computed Tomography.

Juliana Gomes, Grace J Gang, Aswin Mathews, J Webster Stayman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic fluence field modulation for miscentered patients in computed tomography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018
    Article
  6. Joint Optimization of Fluence Field Modulation and Regularization for Multi-Task Objectives.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliana GomesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD, USA 21205.
Grace J GangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD, USA 21205.
Aswin MathewsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD, USA 21205.
J Webster StaymanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD, USA 21205.

Funding

Task-driven dynamic beam modulation for high-performance,low-dose CT.U01EB018758 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STAYMAN, JOSEPH WEBSTER · 2014 to 2017
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB018758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCommonly 2D scouts or topograms are used prior to CT scan acquisition. However, low-dose 3D scouts could potentially provide additional information for more effective patient positioning and selection of acquisition protocols. We propose using model-based iterative reconstruction to reconstruct low exposure tomographic data to maintain image quality in both low-dose 3D scouts and reprojected topograms based on those 3D scouts.

methodsWe performed tomographic acquisitions on a CBCT test-bench using a range of exposure settings from 16.6 to 231.9 total mAs. Both an anthropomorphic phantom and a 32 cm CTDI phantom were scanned. The penalized-likelihood reconstructions were made using Matlab and CUDA libraries and reconstruction parameters were tuned to determine the best regularization strength and delta parameter. RMS error between reconstructions and the highest exposure reconstruction were computed, and CTDI

resultsWe find that we are able to produce low-dose (0.417 mGy) 3D scouts that show high-contrast and large anatomical features while maintaining the ability to produce traditional topograms.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that iterative reconstruction can mitigate noise in very low exposure CT acquisitions to enable 3D CT scout. Such additional 3D information may lead to improved protocols for patient positioning and acquisition refinements as well as a number of advanced dose reduction strategies that require localization of anatomical features and quantities that are not provided by simple 2D topograms.

Identifiers

PMID28596635
PMCPMC5460912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.