Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28596336›Full record

ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2017

Regenerating optic pathways from the eye to the brain.

Bireswar Laha, Ben K Stafford, Andrew D Huberman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pericytes in the optic nerve head.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  17. Serotonin neuromodulation directs optic nerve regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Article
  18. Nanotherapy for Neural Retinal Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bireswar LahaDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7831-0920
Ben K StaffordDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Andrew D HubermanDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. adh1@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3279-5963

Funding

Molecular and functional regeneration of the accessory optic pathwayR01EY027713 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUBERMAN, ANDREW D, KOLODKIN, ALEX L · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
Promoting optic nerve and retinofugal pathway regenerationR01EY026100 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HUBERMAN, ANDREW D · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026100NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are highly visual. Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the neurons that connect the eyes to the brain, fail to regenerate after damage, eventually leading to blindness. Here, we review research on regeneration and repair of the optic system. Intrinsic developmental growth programs can be reactivated in RGCs, neural activity can enhance RGC regeneration, and functional reformation of eye-to-brain connections is possible, even in the adult brain. Transplantation and gene therapy may serve to replace or resurrect dead or injured retinal neurons. Retinal prosthetics that can restore vision in animal models may too have practical power in the clinical setting. Functional restoration of sight in certain forms of blindness is likely to occur in human patients in the near future.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBlindnessCicatrixHumansInflammationMyelin ProteinsOptic NerveRegenerationRetinal Ganglion CellsStem Cell TransplantationMyelin Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28596336
PMCPMC6333302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.