Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28596196›Full record

Observational studyAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Effect of Retrievable Stent Size on Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multicenter Study.

D Yang, Y Hao, W Zi, H Wang, D Zheng, H Li, M Tu, Y Wan, P Jin, G Xiao and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Endovascular retrograde approach may be a better option for acute tandem occlusions stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

D YangFrom the Department of Neurology (D.Y., H.W., X.L.), Jinling Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-0499
Y HaoDepartment of Neurology (Y.H., G.Xu, X.L.), Jinling Hospital, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3285-066X
W ZiDepartment of Neurology (W.Z., Y.X., G.Xu, X.L.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-2659
H WangFrom the Department of Neurology (D.Y., H.W., X.L.), Jinling Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-0927
D ZhengDepartment of Neurology (D.Z.), 175th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Affiliated Southeast Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhangzhou, Fujian Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2085-8795
H LiDepartment of Neurology (H.L.), 476th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-0899
M TuDepartment of Neurology (M.T.), Hubei Wuchang Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2638-6349
Y WanDepartment of Neurology (Y.W.), Hubei Zhongshan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0733-7111
P JinDepartment of Neurology (P.J.), Lu'an Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, Anhui Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7935-1211
G XiaoDepartment of Neurology (G.Xiao), Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University; Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2674-5505
Y XiongDepartment of Neurology (W.Z., Y.X., G.Xu, X.L.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-2295
G XuDepartment of Neurology (Y.H., G.Xu, X.L.), Jinling Hospital, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China gelinxu@nju.edu.cn xfliu2@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6194-0341
X LiuFrom the Department of Neurology (D.Y., H.W., X.L.), Jinling Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China gelinxu@nju.edu.cn xfliu2@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8182-9632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIn clinical practice, stent diameter is one of the variable properties important for endovascular treatment. A consensus guideline for stent retriever size selection has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different diameters of Solitaire retrievers on outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsOf 628 patients enrolled from the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Registry, 256 were treated with the Solitaire 4-mm device and 372, with the 6-mm device. We matched patients treated with the 2 stent sizes using propensity score analysis. The successful outcome was reperfusion as measured by the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score immediately postprocedure and the dichotomized modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and in-hospital mortality were also recorded.

resultsAfter propensity score analysis, group outcomes did not differ. In addition, in patients with atherosclerosis-related occlusion, a higher reperfusion rate (

conclusionsWe found no evidence of a differential effect of intra-arterial therapy based on the size of Solitaire retrievers. In patients with atherosclerotic disease, favorable reperfusion was associated with deployment of a small stent.

Indexed as

StentsAgedAtherosclerosisBrain IschemiaCerebral HemorrhageEndovascular ProceduresEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMechanical ThrombolysisMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRegistriesReperfusionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28596196
PMCPMC7960417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.