ArticleCMAJ open2017
Hepatitis B virus testing and linkage to care in a Canadian urban tertiary referral centre: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in CMAJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatitis B Blood Donor Screening Data: An Under-Recognized Resource for Canadian Public Health Surveillance.Viruses · 2023Article
- Cascade of care among hepatitis B patients in Maastricht, the Netherlands, 1996 to 2018.Journal of virus eradication · 2022Article
- Molecular epidemiology and clinical characteristics of hepatitis D virus infection in Canada.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2022Article
- Impact of Hepatitis B Virus Genetic Variation, Integration, and Lymphotropism in Antiviral Treatment and Oncogenesis.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Baseline assessment of and linkage to care for newly diagnosed patients with chronic hepatitis B.Canadian liver journal · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite universal vaccination, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a public health concern in North America owing to immigration. We aimed to characterize the number of people with a positive result of testing for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) in Calgary, a large urban Canadian health care region, and to assess whether recommended laboratory tests and specialist consultation were done for those identified as HBsAg-positive.
methodsBased on laboratory and Alberta Health Services administrative data, we identified all adults (age > 18 yr) with a positive HBsAg test result from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2014 within the Calgary Zone. Demographic and relevant laboratory data were extracted within 6 months of a positive HBsAg test result, and referral to hepatology (2011-2014) was identified from data on referral to a centralized clinic. Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods were used for analyses.
resultsWe identified 1214 HBsAg-positive people (584 women [48.1%]; median age 44 [interquartile range (IQR) 36-55] yr). A total of 1192 people (98.2%) had alanine aminotransferase testing (median level 23 [IQR 16-34] U/L; 117 [9.8%] with elevated levels), 682 (56.2%) had testing for HBV DNA (median level 2.8 [IQR 2.1-3.8] logIU/mL), 630 (51.9%) had HBV e antigen testing (negative result in 548 [87.0%]), and 145 (11.9%) had HBV e antibody testing (positive result in 111 [76.6%]). Overall, 144 people (11.9%) received anti-HBV treatment, and 390 (32.1%) were referred to a hepatologist.
interpretationMany HBsAg-positive people in Calgary did not receive the recommended laboratory assessments. The results highlight the necessity of continual public health efforts to screen for chronic HBV infection in Canada and to ensure adequate follow-up in order to reach the World Health Organization's goal of viral hepatitis elimination by 2030.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.