Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28596156›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2017

Noninvasive Interrogation of Cancer Metabolism with Hyperpolarized

Andrew Cho, Justin Y C Lau, Benjamin J Geraghty, Charles H Cunningham, Kayvan R Keshari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Hyperpolarized [6-ACS chemical biology · 2019
    Article
  8. A non-synthetic approach to extending the lifetime of hyperpolarized molecules using DJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2018
    Article
  9. Imaging Cancer Metabolism: Underlying Biology and Emerging Strategies.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew ChoWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Justin Y C LauPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin J GeraghtyPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charles H CunninghamPhysical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kayvan R KeshariWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York rahimkk@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
GE Diamond DNP PolarizerS10OD016422 · OD · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HRICAK, HEDVIG, KESHARI, KAYVAN R · 2014 to 2014
$600k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS S10 OD016422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review will highlight recent advances in hyperpolarized

Indexed as

Carbon IsotopesHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsCarbon Isotopesdynamic nuclear polarizationinstrumentationmetabolismmolecular imagingMRIpulse sequences

Identifiers

PMID28596156
PMCPMC6944182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.