ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2017
Planning strategies for inter-fractional robustness in pancreatic patients treated with scanned carbon therapy.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Target Coverage Improvement With Dose Matching in Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- Comparing different boost concepts and beam configurations for proton therapy of pancreatic cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Ultrasound-assisted carbon ion dosimetry and range measurement using injectable polymer-shelled phase-change nanodroplets: in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- AAPM Task Group Report 290: Respiratory motion management for particle therapy.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Robust treatment planning in scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Clinical verification using in-room computed tomography images.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- An adaptive planning strategy in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer involving beam angle selection.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Adaptive planning based on single beam optimization in passive scattering carbon ion radiotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- Robust Angle Selection in Particle Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Inter-fractional monitoring of [Formula: see text]C ions treatments: results from a clinical trial at the CNAO facility.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2019Article
- Comparison of different treatment planning approaches for intensity-modulated proton therapy with simultaneous integrated boost for pancreatic cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Significance of intra-fractional motion for pancreatic patients treated with charged particles.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Effective radiotherapeutic treatment intensification in patients with pancreatic cancer: higher doses alone, higher RBE or both?Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManaging inter-fractional anatomy changes is a challenging task in radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors, especially in scanned carbon-ion delivery. This treatment planning study aims to focus on clinically feasible solutions, such as the beam angle selection and margin design to increase the robustness against inter-fractional uncertainties.
methodsThis study included 10 patients with weekly 3D-CT imaging and physician-approved Clinical Target Volume (CTV). The study was directed to keep the CTV-coverage using six beam angle configurations in combination with different Internal Target Volume (ITV) concepts. These were: geometric-margin (symmetric 3 and 5 mm margin); range-equivalent margins with an isotropic HU replacement; and to evaluate the need of asymmetric margins the water-equivalent range path (WEPL) was determined per patient from the set of CTs. Plan optimization and forward dose calculation in each week-CT were performed with the research treatment planning system TRiP98 and the plan quality evaluated in terms of CTV coverage (V95
resultsThe beam geometry had a substantial impact on the target irradiation over the treatment course, with the single posterior or two beams showing the best average coverage of the CTV. The use of geometric margins for the more robust beam geometries showed acceptable results, with a V95
conclusionsSelection of adequate beam configurations and treatment margins in ion-beam therapy of pancreatic tumors is of great importance. For a single posterior beam or two beam configurations, application of geometrical margins compensate for dose degradation induced by inter-fractional anatomy changes for the majority of the analyzed treatment fractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.