Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28595576›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Perceptions of quality across the maternal care continuum in the context of a health financing intervention: Evidence from a mixed methods study in rural Malawi.

Christabel Kambala, Julia Lohmann, Jacob Mazalale, Stephan Brenner, Malabika Sarker, Adamson S Muula, Manuela De Allegri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploration of Telemidwifery: An Initiation of Application Menu in Indonesia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christabel KambalaInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany. christabel_kambala@yahoo.com.
Julia LohmannInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jacob MazalaleInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephan BrennerInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Malabika SarkerInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Adamson S MuulaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Private Bag 360, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Manuela De AllegriInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2013, Malawi with its development partners introduced a Results-Based Financing for Maternal and Newborn Health (RBF4MNH) intervention to improve the quality of maternal and newborn health-care services. Financial incentives are awarded to health facilities conditional on their performance and to women for delivering in the health facility. We assessed the effect of the RBF4MNH on quality of care from women's perspectives.

methodsWe used a mixed-method prospective sequential controlled pre- and post-test design. We conducted 3060 structured client exit interviews, 36 in-depth interviews and 29 focus group discussions (FGDs) with women and 24 in-depth interviews with health service providers between 2013 and 2015. We used difference-in-differences regression models to measure the effect of the RBF4MNH on experiences and perceived quality of care. We used qualitative data to explore the matter more in depth.

resultsWe did not observe a statistically significant effect of the intervention on women's perceptions of technical care, quality of amenities and interpersonal relations. However, in the qualitative interviews, most women reported improved health service provision as a result of the intervention. RBF4MNH increased the proportion of women reporting to have received medications/treatment during childbirth. Participants in interviews expressed that drugs, equipment and supplies were readily available due to the RBF4MNH. However, women also reported instances of neglect, disrespect and verbal abuse during the process of care. Providers attributed these negative instances to an increased workload resulting from an increased number of women seeking services at RBF4MNH facilities.

conclusionOur qualitative findings suggest improvements in the availability of drugs and supplies due to RBF4MNH. Despite the intervention, challenges in the provision of quality care persisted, especially with regard to interpersonal relations. RBF interventions may need to consider including indicators that specifically target the provision of respectful maternity care as a means to foster providers' positive attitudes towards women in labour. In parallel, governments should consider enhancing staff and infrastructural capacity before implementing RBF.

Indexed as

Healthcare FinancingMaternal Health ServicesQuality of Health CareContinuity of Patient CareDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant HealthInterviews as TopicMalawiMaternal HealthPregnancyProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchConditional Cash TransfersDemand-side financingMalawiMaternal carePerformance-based financingQuality of careResults-Based Financing

Identifiers

PMID28595576
PMCPMC5465597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.