Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28595504›Full record

ArticleThe Diabetes educator2017

Differential Relationships Between Diabetes Knowledge Scales and Diabetes Outcomes.

Aprill Z Dawson, Rebekah J Walker, Leonard E Egede

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Diabetes educator, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Filial Piety and Tiwala: Diabetes Knowledge and Family Support Among Chinese and Filipino Americans.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Glycemic control among People living with HIV and diabetes in Eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aprill Z DawsonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Ms Dawson, Dr Walker, Dr Egede).
Rebekah J WalkerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Ms Dawson, Dr Walker, Dr Egede).
Leonard E EgedeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Ms Dawson, Dr Walker, Dr Egede).

Funding

SHORT-TERM TRAINING IN HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLST35DK007431 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI LACKLAND, DANIEL T · 1990 to 2019
$2.1M
Technology Intensified Diabetes Education Study in AA with T2DM (TIDES)K24DK093699 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E. · 2011 to 2020
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK093699NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK007431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Diabetes affects more than 29 million people in the US and requires daily self-management in addition to knowledge of the disease. Three knowledge assessments used are the Michigan Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT), Starr County Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ), and Kaiser DISTANCE Survey (DISTANCE). Purpose The purpose of the study was to test the discriminate validity of 3 diabetes knowledge scales and determine which is best associated with diabetes self-care and glycemic control. Methods Three hundred sixty-one adults with type 2 diabetes were recruited from primary care clinics. Four analyses were conducted to investigate the validity and relationships of the scale: alpha statistic to test internal validity, factor analysis to determine how much of the variance was explained, Pearson's correlation between the 3 scales, and Pearson's correlation between each scale, self-care, and outcomes. Results The DKQ had an alpha of 0.75, the DKT had an alpha of 0.49, and DISTANCE had an alpha of 0.36. The DKQ was significantly correlated with glycemic control. The DKT scale was significantly associated with general diet, the DISTANCE survey was significantly associated with exercise, and both DKT and DISTANCE were significantly associated with foot care. Conclusion Correlations among the 3 scales were modest, suggesting the scales are not measuring the same underlying construct. These findings indicate that researchers should carefully select scales appropriate for study goals or to appropriately capture the information being sought to inform practice.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf-ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID28595504
PMCPMC7029816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.