Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28595050›Full record

ReviewNeuron2017

Inference in the Brain: Statistics Flowing in Redundant Population Codes.

Xaq Pitkow, Dora E Angelaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond Divisive Normalization: Scalable Feedforward Networks for Multisensory Integration Across Reference Frames.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Priority coding in the visual system.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Robust Coding of Eye Position in Posterior Parietal Cortex despite Context-Dependent Tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xaq PitkowDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA. Electronic address: xaq@rice.edu.
Dora E AngelakiDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.

Funding

Dynamic network computations for foraging in an uncertain environmentU01NS094368 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ANGELAKI, DORA, DRAGOI, VALENTIN · 2015 to 2017
$3.8M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS094368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely believed that the brain performs approximate probabilistic inference to estimate causal variables in the world from ambiguous sensory data. To understand these computations, we need to analyze how information is represented and transformed by the actions of nonlinear recurrent neural networks. We propose that these probabilistic computations function by a message-passing algorithm operating at the level of redundant neural populations. To explain this framework, we review its underlying concepts, including graphical models, sufficient statistics, and message-passing, and then describe how these concepts could be implemented by recurrently connected probabilistic population codes. The relevant information flow in these networks will be most interpretable at the population level, particularly for redundant neural codes. We therefore outline a general approach to identify the essential features of a neural message-passing algorithm. Finally, we argue that to reveal the most important aspects of these neural computations, we must study large-scale activity patterns during moderately complex, naturalistic behaviors.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, NeurologicalProbabilityBrainDecision MakingHumansLogicNerve NetNonlinear DynamicsPerceptionbraincodinginferencemessage-passingnonlinearnuisancepopulation coderedundanttheory

Identifiers

PMID28595050
PMCPMC5543692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.