Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594960›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A portable image-based cytometer for rapid malaria detection and quantification.

Dahou Yang, Gowtham Subramanian, Jinming Duan, Shaobing Gao, Li Bai, Rajesh Chandramohanadas, Ye Ai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Remoscope: a label-free imaging cytometer for malaria diagnostics.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Diagnostic Methods for Non-Falciparum Malaria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Automatic detection ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Image analysis and machine learning for detecting malaria.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dahou YangPillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore.
Gowtham SubramanianPillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore.
Jinming DuanSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Shaobing GaoSchool of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Li BaiSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rajesh ChandramohanadasPillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8760-0396
Ye AiPillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore.
Singapore University of Technology and Design · SGUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing resistance by malaria parasites to currently used antimalarials across the developing world warrants timely detection and classification so that appropriate drug combinations can be administered before clinical complications arise. However, this is often challenged by low levels of infection (referred to as parasitemia) and presence of predominantly young parasitic forms in the patients' peripheral blood. Herein, we developed a simple, inexpensive and portable image-based cytometer that detects and numerically counts Plasmodium falciparum infected red blood cells (iRBCs) from Giemsa-stained smears derived from infected blood. Our cytometer is able to classify all parasitic subpopulations by quantifying the area occupied by the parasites within iRBCs, with high specificity, sensitivity and negligible false positives (~ 0.0025%). Moreover, we demonstrate the application of our image-based cytometer in testing anti-malarial efficacy against a commercial flow cytometer and demonstrate comparable results between the two methods. Collectively, these results highlight the possibility to use our image-based cytometer as a cheap, rapid and accurate alternative for antimalarial testing without compromising on efficiency and minimal processing time. With appropriate filters applied into the algorithm, to rule out leukocytes and reticulocytes, our cytometer may also be used for field diagnosis of malaria.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAutomationCell CountErythrocytesHumansImage CytometryImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInhibitory Concentration 50MalariaParasitemiaReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID28594960
PMCPMC5464641
OpenAlexW2623533525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.