ArticlePloS one2017
Non-invasive genetics outperforms morphological methods in faecal dietary analysis, revealing wild boar as a considerable conservation concern for ground-nesting birds.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- DIY: A Practical Field-to-Sequencer Workflow for Metabarcoding the Diet of Terrestrial Carnivore Species.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Surveillance of Influenza A Virus Exposure in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) in Spain (2015-2023): Serologic and Virologic Evidence of Subtype Infections and H5N1 Spillover Risk.Zoonoses and public health · 2026Article
- DNA metabarcoding on roadkill stomach contents reveals the breadth of species present in bobcat diets.PloS one · 2026Article
- A Method for Preparing Morphologically Preserved Wildlife Fecal Specimens for Long-Term Ecological Studies.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- From Removal to Selective Control: Perspectives on Predation Management in Spanish Hunting Grounds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The Effect of the Wild Boar Hunting System on Agricultural Damages: The North-East of Italy as a Case Scenario.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- DNA metabarcoding reveals consumption of diverse community of amphibians by invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the southeastern United States.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Fifty years of spring censuses in black grouse (European journal of wildlife research · 2023Article
- Distinctive diets of eutherian predators in Australia.Royal Society open science · 2022Review
- High overlap of zoonotic helminths between wild mammalian predators and rural dogs - an emerging One Health concern?Parasitology · 2022Article
- Article
- Zoning has little impact on the seasonal diel activity and distribution patterns of wild boar (Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Too many wild boar? Modelling fertility control and culling to reduce wild boar numbers in isolated populations.PloS one · 2020Article
- Development of an easy and cost-effective method for non-invasive genotyping of insects.PloS one · 2019Article
- Hotspots of recent hybridization between pigs and wild boars in Europe.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and other grouse species represent conservation concerns across Europe due to their negative abundance trends. In addition to habitat deterioration, predation is considered a major factor contributing to population declines. While the role of generalist predators on grouse predation is relatively well known, the impact of the omnivorous wild boar has remained elusive. We hypothesize that wild boar is an important predator of ground-nesting birds, but has been neglected as a bird predator because traditional morphological methods underestimate the proportion of birds in wild boar diet. To distinguish between different mammalian predator species, as well as different grouse prey species, we developed a molecular method based on the analysis of mitochondrial DNA that allows accurate species identification. We collected 109 wild boar faeces at protected capercaillie leks and surrounding areas and analysed bird consumption using genetic methods and classical morphological examination. Genetic analysis revealed that the proportion of birds in wild boar faeces was significantly higher (17.3%; 4.5×) than indicated by morphological examination (3.8%). Moreover, the genetic method allowed considerably more precise taxonomic identification of consumed birds compared to morphological analysis. Our results demonstrate: (i) the value of using genetic approaches in faecal dietary analysis due to their higher sensitivity, and (ii) that wild boar is an important predator of ground-nesting birds, deserving serious consideration in conservation planning for capercaillie and other grouse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.