Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594948›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Easy and non-invasive disease detection in pigs by adenosine deaminase activity determinations in saliva.

Ana María Gutiérrez, Ernesto De La Cruz-Sánchez, Ana Montes, Juan Sotillo, Cándido Gutiérrez-Panizo, Pablo Fuentes, Pedro Luis Tornel, Juan Cabezas-Herrera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana María GutiérrezDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1052-935X
Ernesto De La Cruz-SánchezDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, San Javier, Murcia, Spain.
Ana MontesDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
Juan SotilloDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
Cándido Gutiérrez-PanizoDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
Pablo FuentesCefu S.A., Alhama de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Pedro Luis TornelClinical Analysis Service, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
Juan Cabezas-HerreraMolecular Therapy and Biomarkers Research Group, Clinical Analysis Service, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
Universidad de Murcia · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantification of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in porcine saliva samples has been analyzed for its use as a marker of disease. First, an analytical validation of the enzymatic assay used for ADA measurements was performed. Afterwards, saliva samples were collected from 50 healthy animals and 64 animals with different symptoms of disease, which were divided into local inflammation, gastrointestinal disorder, respiratory disorder and growth retardation. To optimize ADA measurements, total ADA (tADA), specific ADA (sADA) and ADA isoforms 1 and 2 activities were calculated. Moreover, to preliminarily estimate the diagnostic value of tADA activity measurements for disease detection, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses was performed and compared to the results obtained for salivary acute phase proteins, haptoglobin (Hp) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The salivary levels of tADA activity were significantly elevated in animals with local inflammation, gastrointestinal disorder and respiratory disorder. The calculation of the different ADA activities did not provide additional information to tADA activity quantification for disease detection. The diagnostic value of tADA activity was superior to those observed for Hp and CRP measurements in the present study. It might be concluded that ADA analysis in saliva could be used as a simple, rapid, economic and non-invasive diagnostic tool in porcine production in field conditions.

Indexed as

Acute-Phase ProteinsAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsC-Reactive ProteinLinear ModelsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSalivaStatistics, NonparametricSus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesAcute-Phase ProteinsAdenosine DeaminaseC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID28594948
PMCPMC5464646
OpenAlexW2624506765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.