Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594930›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Evaluation of an enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocol in Salmonella contaminated pig holdings in the United Kingdom.

Francesca Martelli, Mark Lambert, Paul Butt, Tanya Cheney, Fabrizio Antonio Tatone, Rebecca Callaby, André Rabie, Rebecca J Gosling, Steve Fordon, Graham Crocker and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biosecurity measures reducingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Non-diarrhoeic pigs as source of highly virulent and multidrug-resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca MartelliDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4934-5272
Mark LambertNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, United Kingdom.
Paul ButtADAS, Pendeford, United Kingdom.
Tanya CheneyDepartment of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Fabrizio Antonio TatoneDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Rebecca CallabyNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, United Kingdom.
André RabieDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Rebecca J GoslingDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Steve FordonQuill Productions, Pulham, United Kingdom.
Graham CrockerQuill Productions, Pulham, United Kingdom.
Robert H DaviesDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Richard Piers SmithDepartment of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBAgricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella is the second most commonly reported zoonotic gastrointestinal pathogen in the European Union, and a significant proportion of the cases are linked to the consumption of contaminated pork. Reduction of Salmonella at the farm level helps to mininimise the contamination pressure at the slaughterhouse, and therefore the number of Salmonella bacteria entering the food chain. Cleaning and disinfection (C&D) between batches of pigs is an intervention measure that has potential to reduce the transmission of Salmonella contamination within farms. In this study, two pig finisher buildings in each of 10 Salmonella positive farms were sampled pre-C&D, post-C&D, post-restocking with the following batch of pigs, and shortly before these pigs were sent to slaughter. The incoming batch of pigs was also sampled before it reached the study building (pre-restocking). At each visit, pooled and individual faecal samples were collected and Salmonella isolation was carried out according to an ISO 6579:2002 Annex D-based method. One building on each farm (intervention) was cleaned and disinfected according to a rigorous protocol consisting of several steps and a Defra-approved disinfectant used at the General Orders concentration, whilst the other building (control) was cleaned and disinfected as per normal farm routine. At the post-C&D visit, Enterobacteriaceae and total bacterial counts were determined to evaluate residual faecal contamination and general hygiene levels. Rodent specialists visited the farms before and after C&D and rodent carcasses were collected for Salmonella testing. The intervention buildings were significantly less likely (p = 0.004) to be positive for Salmonella after C&D. The pre-restocking pigs had the highest likelihood (p<0.001) of being Salmonella positive (often with multiple serovars) and there was no significant difference between intervention and control buildings in Salmonella prevalence at the post-restocking visit (p = 0.199). However, the pigs housed in the intervention buildings were significantly less likely (p = 0.004) to be positive for Salmonella at slaughter age. Multivariable analysis suggested that cleaning all fixtures of buildings, leaving the pens empty for 2-3 days and using an effective disinfectant are factors significantly improving the likelihood of removing Salmonella contamination during C&D. Signs of rodents were recorded in all farms, but rodent activity and harbourage availability decreased between visits. All the rats tested were Salmonella negative. S. Typhimurium or its monophasic variants were isolated from 6 mouse carcasses in 3 farms where the same serovars were isolated from pigs. This study demonstrates that an appropriate C&D programme significantly reduces the likelihood of residual contamination in Salmonella positive pig buildings, and suggests a significant reduction in the prevalence of Salmonella in the pigs in appropriately cleaned and disinfected buildings when sampled before slaughter. Due to a high prevalence of infection in replacement pigs, control of Salmonella in pig farms is challenging. Rodents may also contribute to the carry-over of infection between batches. C&D is a useful measure to help reduce the number of infected pigs going to the slaughterhouse, but should be supplemented by other control measures along the pig breeding and production chain.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnterobacteriaceaeFecesFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyMeatSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSwineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID28594930
PMCPMC5464571
OpenAlexW2623606046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.