Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy response in triple negative breast cancer with discovery and targeted proteomics.

Angelo Gámez-Pozo, Lucía Trilla-Fuertes, Guillermo Prado-Vázquez, Cristina Chiva, Rocío López-Vacas, Paolo Nanni, Julia Berges-Soria, Jonas Grossmann, Mariana Díaz-Almirón, Eva Ciruelos and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Novel Predictive Model Incorporating Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signatures for Overall Survival in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Angelo Gámez-PozoMolecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8931-0624
Lucía Trilla-FuertesBiomedica Molecular Medicine SL, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo Prado-VázquezMolecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina ChivaProteomics Unit, Center of Genomics Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Rocío López-VacasMolecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Paolo NanniFunctional Genomics Centre Zurich, University of Zurich/ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julia Berges-SoriaMolecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Jonas GrossmannFunctional Genomics Centre Zurich, University of Zurich/ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mariana Díaz-AlmirónBiostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Eva CiruelosMedical Oncology Service, Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre-i+12, Madrid, Spain.
Eduard SabidóProteomics Unit, Center of Genomics Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Enrique EspinosaMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Ángel Fresno VaraMolecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-1252
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity of Zurich · CHHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancers and usually requires the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery but even with this treatment many patients still suffer from a relapse. The main objective of this study was to identify proteomics-based biomarkers that predict the response to standard adjuvant chemotherapy, so that patients at are not going to benefit from it can be offered therapeutic alternatives.

methodsWe analyzed the proteome of a retrospective series of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded TNBC tissue applying high-throughput label-free quantitative proteomics. We identified several protein signatures with predictive value, which were validated with quantitative targeted proteomics in an independent cohort of patients and further evaluated in publicly available transcriptomics data.

resultsUsing univariate Cox analysis, a panel of 18 proteins was significantly associated with distant metastasis-free survival of patients (p<0.01). A reduced 5-protein profile with prognostic value was identified and its prediction performance was assessed in an independent targeted proteomics experiment and a publicly available transcriptomics dataset. Predictor P5 including peptides from proteins RAC2, RAB6A, BIEA and IPYR was the best performance protein combination in predicting relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients.

conclusionsThis study identified a protein combination signature that complements histopathological prognostic factors in TNBC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The protein signature can be used in paraffin-embedded samples, and after a prospective validation in independent series, it could be used as predictive clinical test in order to recommend participation in clinical trials or a more exhaustive follow-up.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisProteomicsrab GTP-Binding ProteinsRAC2 GTP-Binding Proteinrac GTP-Binding ProteinsSoftwareTranscriptomeTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsRab6 proteinrab GTP-Binding ProteinsRAC2 GTP-Binding Proteinrac GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28594844
PMCPMC5464546
OpenAlexW2622260176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.