Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594818›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

Leveraging functional annotations in genetic risk prediction for human complex diseases.

Yiming Hu, Qiongshi Lu, Ryan Powles, Xinwei Yao, Can Yang, Fang Fang, Xinran Xu, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Polygenic Scores for ADHD: A Meta-Analysis.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving polygenic prediction from whole-genome sequencing data by leveraging predicted epigenomic features.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yiming HuDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-1030
Qiongshi LuDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-0969
Ryan PowlesProgram of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Xinwei YaoYale College, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Can YangDepartment of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Fang FangDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Xinran XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Hongyu ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
STATISTICAL METHODS TO MAP GENES FOR COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM059507 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, HONGYU · 1999 to 2013
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059507NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic risk prediction is an important goal in human genetics research and precision medicine. Accurate prediction models will have great impacts on both disease prevention and early treatment strategies. Despite the identification of thousands of disease-associated genetic variants through genome wide association studies (GWAS), genetic risk prediction accuracy remains moderate for most diseases, which is largely due to the challenges in both identifying all the functionally relevant variants and accurately estimating their effect sizes in the presence of linkage disequilibrium. In this paper, we introduce AnnoPred, a principled framework that leverages diverse types of genomic and epigenomic functional annotations in genetic risk prediction for complex diseases. AnnoPred is trained using GWAS summary statistics in a Bayesian framework in which we explicitly model various functional annotations and allow for linkage disequilibrium estimated from reference genotype data. Compared with state-of-the-art risk prediction methods, AnnoPred achieves consistently improved prediction accuracy in both extensive simulations and real data.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingDatabases, GeneticData Interpretation, StatisticalData MiningEpigenomicsGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenome, HumanHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProportional Hazards ModelsQuantitative Trait LociRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28594818
PMCPMC5481142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.