Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594779›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2017

Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis.

Charlotte A Gaydos, Sajo Beqaj, Jane R Schwebke, Joel Lebed, Bonnie Smith, Thomas E Davis, Kenneth H Fife, Paul Nyirjesy, Timothy Spurrell, Dorothy Furgerson and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021
    Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Non-Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Women presenting to emergency departments with vaginitis should be offered single-dose empirical treatment.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Hallmarks of Bacterial Vaginosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Rapid Molecular Diagnostics in Vulvovaginal Candidosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Case series onAccess microbiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte A GaydosJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Pathology Inc, Torrance, California; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Houston, Texas; Sidney and Lois Eskenazi Hospital and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, New Haven, Connecticut; Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, San Jose, California; and BD Diagnostics, Québec, Canada, and Sparks, Maryland.
Sajo Beqaj
Jane R Schwebke
Joel Lebed
Bonnie Smith
Thomas E Davis
Kenneth H Fife
Paul Nyirjesy
Timothy Spurrell
Dorothy Furgerson
Jenell Coleman
Sonia Paradis
Charles K Cooper
Planned Parenthood · US

Funding

LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yukari C Manabe, Susan Anne Tuddenham · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVaginitis may be diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, or coinfection. A new molecular test assays the vaginal microbiome and organisms that cause three common infections. The objective of the trial was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the investigational test for vaginal swabs collected by patients (self) or clinicians. The primary and secondary outcomes were to compare the investigational test with reference methods for the three most common causes of vaginitis and compare clinician-collected with self-collected swabs.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in which women with symptoms of vaginitis were recruited at ten clinical centers and consented to the investigation between May and September 2015. The woman collected a vaginal swab, sheathed, and then handed it to the clinician. These swabs were to evaluate how self-collected swabs compared with clinician-collected swabs. The clinician collected an investigational test swab and reference test swabs. From 1,740 symptomatic patients, clinician-collected and self-collected vaginal swabs were evaluated by the molecular test and six tests. The reference methods for bacterial vaginosis were Nugent's score and Amsel's criteria for intermediate Nugent results. The reference methods for Candida infection were isolation of any potential Candida microorganisms from inoculation of two culture media: chromogenic and Sabouraud agar and sequencing. The reference methods for trichomoniasis were wet mount and culture.

resultsFor clinician-collected swabs, by reference methods, bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 56.5%, vaginal candidiasis in 32.8%, trichomoniasis in 8%, and none of the three infections in 24% with a coinfection rate of 20%. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-92.2%) and specificity was 85.8% (95% CI 83.0-88.3%) for bacterial vaginosis. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 88.1-93.1%) and specificity was 94.1% (95% CI 92.6-95.4%) for the Candida group. Sensitivity for Candida glabrata was 75.9% (95% CI 57.9-87.8%) and specificity was 99.7% (95% CI 99.3-99.9%). Investigational test sensitivity was 93.1% (95% CI 87.4-96.3%) and specificity was 99.3% (95% CI 98.7-99.6%) for trichomoniasis. Results from self-collected swabs were similar to clinician-collected swabs.

conclusionA molecular-based test using vaginal swabs collected by clinicians or patients can accurately diagnose most common bacterial, fungal, and protozoan causes of vaginitis. Women and their clinicians seeking accurate diagnosis and appropriate selection of efficacious treatment for symptoms of vaginitis might benefit from this molecular test.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCandidaCandidiasis, VulvovaginalFemaleHumansLactobacillusMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsTrichomonas InfectionsTrichomonas vaginalisUnited StatesVaginal SmearsVaginitisVaginosis, BacterialYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28594779
PMCPMC5635603
OpenAlexW2622942920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.