ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2017
Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Five Clinically Relevant Genital Microorganisms Among Women in South America, 2014-2024: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021Guideline
- Vaginal Ecosystem During Gestation and Puerperium: Microbiota, Dysbiosis, Infection and Fetal-Maternal Implications.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Vaginal PRA1 identifies clinically relevant Candida albicans vaginitis and excludes asymptomatic colonization: an exploratory study.BMC microbiology · 2026Observational
- Clinical evaluation of Candida albicans enolase 1 as a novel biomarker for vulvovaginal candidiasis: a pilot study demonstrating rule-out capability.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Diagnosis of Abnormal Vaginal Discharge Using qPCR-Based Microbial Dysbiosis Indices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Non-Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Investigating the effect of vitamin C supplementation on bacterial vaginosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Accuracy of Empiric Treatment Among Patients With Vaginitis Symptoms in the United States.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025Article
- Evaluation of SAT-Candida: a rapid RNA-based isothermal amplification assay for detection and identification of Candida spp. in vaginal specimens.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2025Article
- Women presenting to emergency departments with vaginitis should be offered single-dose empirical treatment.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Syndromic approaches for sexually transmitted infections: added value of molecular diagnosis.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2025Review
- Hallmarks of Bacterial Vaginosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Rapid Molecular Diagnostics in Vulvovaginal Candidosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Candidiasis in Pregnancy: Relevant Aspects of the Pathology for the Mother and the Fetus and Therapeutic Strategies.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Various Diagnostic Strategies for Bacterial Vaginosis, Including a New Approach Based on MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Vaginal microbiota molecular profiling and diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted multiplex PCR testing in women with bacterial vaginosis: a single-center experience.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Case series onAccess microbiology · 2024Article
- Molecular Identification of Fungal Species through Multiplex-qPCR to Determine Candidal Vulvovaginitis and Antifungal Susceptibility.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byIn Reply.2017
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveVaginitis may be diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, or coinfection. A new molecular test assays the vaginal microbiome and organisms that cause three common infections. The objective of the trial was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the investigational test for vaginal swabs collected by patients (self) or clinicians. The primary and secondary outcomes were to compare the investigational test with reference methods for the three most common causes of vaginitis and compare clinician-collected with self-collected swabs.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in which women with symptoms of vaginitis were recruited at ten clinical centers and consented to the investigation between May and September 2015. The woman collected a vaginal swab, sheathed, and then handed it to the clinician. These swabs were to evaluate how self-collected swabs compared with clinician-collected swabs. The clinician collected an investigational test swab and reference test swabs. From 1,740 symptomatic patients, clinician-collected and self-collected vaginal swabs were evaluated by the molecular test and six tests. The reference methods for bacterial vaginosis were Nugent's score and Amsel's criteria for intermediate Nugent results. The reference methods for Candida infection were isolation of any potential Candida microorganisms from inoculation of two culture media: chromogenic and Sabouraud agar and sequencing. The reference methods for trichomoniasis were wet mount and culture.
resultsFor clinician-collected swabs, by reference methods, bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 56.5%, vaginal candidiasis in 32.8%, trichomoniasis in 8%, and none of the three infections in 24% with a coinfection rate of 20%. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-92.2%) and specificity was 85.8% (95% CI 83.0-88.3%) for bacterial vaginosis. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 88.1-93.1%) and specificity was 94.1% (95% CI 92.6-95.4%) for the Candida group. Sensitivity for Candida glabrata was 75.9% (95% CI 57.9-87.8%) and specificity was 99.7% (95% CI 99.3-99.9%). Investigational test sensitivity was 93.1% (95% CI 87.4-96.3%) and specificity was 99.3% (95% CI 98.7-99.6%) for trichomoniasis. Results from self-collected swabs were similar to clinician-collected swabs.
conclusionA molecular-based test using vaginal swabs collected by clinicians or patients can accurately diagnose most common bacterial, fungal, and protozoan causes of vaginitis. Women and their clinicians seeking accurate diagnosis and appropriate selection of efficacious treatment for symptoms of vaginitis might benefit from this molecular test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.