Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594460›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2017

Detection and diagnosis of colitis on computed tomography using deep convolutional neural networks.

Jiamin Liu, David Wang, Le Lu, Zhuoshi Wei, Lauren Kim, Evrim B Turkbey, Berkman Sahiner, Nicholas A Petrick, Ronald M Summers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Deep Learning Model for Idiopathic Osteosclerosis Detection on Panoramic Radiographs.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development and validation of a deep learning system for ascites cytopathology interpretation.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2020
    Article
  9. A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiamin LiuImaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory and Clinical Image Processing Service, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
David WangImaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory and Clinical Image Processing Service, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Le LuImaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory and Clinical Image Processing Service, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Zhuoshi WeiImaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory and Clinical Image Processing Service, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Lauren KimImaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory and Clinical Image Processing Service, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Evrim B TurkbeyImaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory and Clinical Image Processing Service, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Berkman SahinerFood and Drug Administration/CDRH, Silver Spring, USA.
Nicholas A PetrickFood and Drug Administration/CDRH, Silver Spring, USA.
Ronald M SummersImaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory and Clinical Image Processing Service, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USFood and Drug Administration · THUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZ01CL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2003 to 2008
$41k
Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZIACL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CL040004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeColitis refers to inflammation of the inner lining of the colon that is frequently associated with infection and allergic reactions. In this paper, we propose deep convolutional neural networks methods for lesion-level colitis detection and a support vector machine (SVM) classifier for patient-level colitis diagnosis on routine abdominal CT scans.

methodsThe recently developed Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster RCNN) is utilized for lesion-level colitis detection. For each 2D slice, rectangular region proposals are generated by region proposal networks (RPN). Then, each region proposal is jointly classified and refined by a softmax classifier and bounding-box regressor. Two convolutional neural networks, eight layers of ZF net and 16 layers of VGG net are compared for colitis detection. Finally, for each patient, the detections on all 2D slices are collected and a SVM classifier is applied to develop a patient-level diagnosis. We trained and evaluated our method with 80 colitis patients and 80 normal cases using 4 × 4-fold cross validation.

resultsFor lesion-level colitis detection, with ZF net, the mean of average precisions (mAP) were 48.7% and 50.9% for RCNN and Faster RCNN, respectively. The detection system achieved sensitivities of 51.4% and 54.0% at two false positives per patient for RCNN and Faster RCNN, respectively. With VGG net, Faster RCNN increased the mAP to 56.9% and increased the sensitivity to 58.4% at two false positive per patient. For patient-level colitis diagnosis, with ZF net, the average areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.978 ± 0.009 and 0.984 ± 0.008 for RCNN and Faster RCNN method, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant with P = 0.18. At the optimal operating point, the RCNN method correctly identified 90.4% (72.3/80) of the colitis patients and 94.0% (75.2/80) of normal cases. The sensitivity improved to 91.6% (73.3/80) and the specificity improved to 95.0% (76.0/80) for the Faster RCNN method. With VGG net, Faster RCNN increased the AUC to 0.986 ± 0.007 and increased the diagnosis sensitivity to 93.7% (75.0/80) and specificity was unchanged at 95.0% (76.0/80).

conclusionColitis detection and diagnosis by deep convolutional neural networks is accurate and promising for future clinical application.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedColitisHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySupport Vector Machinecolitis detectioncolitis diagnosisRegion-based CNNRPN

Identifiers

PMID28594460
PMCPMC5603218
OpenAlexW2624552887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.