Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594355›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing.

Heidi Hofer, Tamara Weidinger, Peter Briza, Claudia Asam, Martin Wolf, Teresa E Twaroch, Frank Stolz, Angela Neubauer, Elfriede Dall, Peter Hammerl and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Heidi HoferDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. heidi.hofer@sbg.ac.at.
Tamara WeidingerDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. tamara.weidinger@stud.sbg.ac.at.
Peter BrizaDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. peter.briza@sbg.ac.at.
Claudia AsamDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. claudia.asam@sbg.ac.at.
Martin WolfDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. martin.wolf@sbg.ac.at.
Teresa E TwarochBiomay AG, Vienna 1090, Austria. teresa.twaroch@gmx.at.
Frank StolzBiomay AG, Vienna 1090, Austria. f.stolz@biomay.com.
Angela NeubauerBiomay AG, Vienna 1090, Austria. a.neubauer@biomay.com.
Elfriede DallDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. elfriede.dall@sbg.ac.at.
Peter HammerlDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. peter.hammerl@sbg.ac.at.
Alain JacquetDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. alain.j@chula.ac.th.
Michael WallnerDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria. michael-wallner@gmx.at.
University of Salzburg · ATBiomay (Austria) · ATChulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF WKP 65
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endolysosomal processing has a critical influence on immunogenicity as well as immune polarization of protein antigens. In industrialized countries, allergies affect around 25% of the population. For the rational design of protein-based allergy therapeutics for immunotherapy, a good knowledge of T cell-reactive regions on allergens is required. Thus, we sought to analyze endolysosomal degradation patterns of inhalant allergens. Four major allergens from ragweed, birch, as well as house dust mites were produced as recombinant proteins. Endolysosomal proteases were purified by differential centrifugation from dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells, and combined with allergens for proteolytic processing. Thereafter, endolysosomal proteolysis was monitored by protein gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. We found that the overall proteolytic activity of specific endolysosomal fractions differed substantially, whereas the degradation patterns of the four model allergens obtained with the different proteases were extremely similar. Moreover, previously identified T cell epitopes were assigned to endolysosomal peptides and indeed showed a good overlap with known T cell epitopes for all four candidate allergens. Thus, we propose that the degradome assay can be used as a predictor to determine antigenic peptides as potential T cell epitopes, which will help in the rational design of protein-based allergy vaccine candidates.

Indexed as

AllergensAnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigens, PlantB-LymphocytesCell LineDendritic CellsLysosomesMacrophagesMass SpectrometryMiceProteolysisPyroglyphidaeRecombinant ProteinsAllergensAntigens, PlantRecombinant Proteinsallergen proteolysisAmb a 1Bet v 1degradome assayDer p 1Der p 2proteases from B cellsproteases from dendritic cellsproteases from macrophages

Identifiers

PMID28594355
PMCPMC5486048
OpenAlexW2624661650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.