Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28594070›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2017

Labor, delivery, and anesthesia experiences of women with physical disability.

Suzanne C Smeltzer, Amy J Wint, Jeffrey L Ecker, Lisa I Iezzoni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. "What Services?": Stakeholders' Perceived Unmet Support Needs for Parents With Neurological Disorders.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Experiences of Women of Short Stature During the Perinatal Period.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne C SmeltzerCenter for Nursing Research, Villanova University College of Nursing, Villanova, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1970-2243
Amy J WintMongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey L EckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Lisa I IezzoniMongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USMGH Institute of Health Professions · USVillanova University · US

Funding

Pregnancy Experience of Women with Physical DisabilitiesR21HD068756 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI IEZZONI, LISA I. · 2012 to 2013
$469k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD068756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough many women with physical disabilities report poor quality reproductive health care, little research has addressed labor, delivery, and anesthesia experiences of these women. This study was conducted to explore these experiences in women with significant mobility disabilities.

methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 22 women from the United States who had delivered newborns within the prior 10 years. All had significant mobility disabilities. Two-hour, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted using a semistructured, open-ended interview protocol, which addressed many topics, including labor, delivery, and anesthesia experiences. We recruited most participants through social networks, interviewing women from 17 states. Conventional content analysis, facilitated by NVivo software, was used to identify major themes.

resultsThe mean age of women was 34.8 ± 5.3 years. Most women were white, college educated, and used wheeled mobility aids. Four key themes emerged from participants' narratives of laboring and giving birth with a disability. These included women's preferences for type of delivery, clinicians and some women expected no labor pain, fears prompting active advocacy, and positive experiences. As participants discussed their experiences with anesthesia, four additional themes were identified: importance of consultation with the anesthesia team, decisions about epidural/spinal vs general anesthesia, failed epidural with repeated efforts, and fear of injury related to anesthesia.

conclusionsThe responses of women in this study suggest that there is need to make intrapartum care better for women with physical disabilities and to improve their experiences with labor, birth, and obstetric anesthesia care.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaLabor, ObstetricParturitionAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedMobility LimitationPersons with DisabilitiesPregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited Statesdisabilitylabor and deliveryobstetrical anesthesiapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28594070
PMCPMC5688006
OpenAlexW2622400855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.